Parliament suspension ruled unlawful amid calls for Boris Johnson to resign
Judiciary dragged into the political war as Government loses case in Scotland
The suspension of Parliament has been ruled unlawful by Scotland’s highest civil court.
MPs were sent home in the early hours of Tuesday morning after Boris Johnson decided to prorogue Parliament until 14 October, the longest such shutdown since the Second World War. The prime minister has been accused of trying to use prorogation to ensure MPs cannot prevent him from pushing through a no-deal Brexit on 31 October.
Today, a cross-party group of more than 70 MPs and peers led by the Scottish National Party’s Joanna Cherry successfully challenged the move at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Henry Hill of ConservativeHome describes the ruling as “another step towards a looming constitutional showdown between the political and judicial elements of our Constitution”.
Here is what the verdict means and what might happen next:
What did the Court of Session find?
The three-judge panel found that Johnson was motivated by the “improper purpose of stymieing Parliament” and had effectively misled the Queen in advising her to agree to the prorogation.
The judges added: “The Court will accordingly make an order declaring that the prime minister’s advice to HM the Queen and the prorogation which followed thereon was unlawful and is thus null and of no effect.”
What does this mean for Brexit?
The stage “is now set for a showdown in the Supreme Court next Tuesday”, after the High Court in London also rejected a similar case, reports The Times. Last week, Judge Lord Doherty said Johnson had not broken the law and that it was for MPs and the public to judge his actions, not the courts.
Clearly, the Court of Session disagreed.
The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg tweets that while “Scots law is different to English law”, the judgment today puts “massive pressure” on the UK Supreme Court to choose which side to take next week.
A spokesperson for Johnson today confirmed to The Telegraph that the prorogation will continue.
But many MPs are calling for Parliament to be reconvened immediately. Scottish MP Cherry said outside the court: “We feel utterly vindicated and I would be confident that the UK Supreme Court will uphold this decision.”
She was backed by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, who said the ruling was of “enormous constitutional significance”.
Meanwhile, Luke Pollard, Labour MP for Plymouth Sutton and Devonport, tweeted a photograph of himself sitting in an empty House of Commons.
Will Johnson be forced to resign?
Former attorney general Dominic Grieve, who was sacked from the Tory party last week, says that Johnson’s position would be “untenable” if he is found to have misled the Queen over prorogation. “I hope it would be untenable not just because of the opposition, because every member of the Conservative that believes in our constitution would simply say, ‘it’s over’,” Grieve said.
Labour peer Andrew Adonis echoed that opinion, saying: “If it is clear that the actual advice given to the Queen was incorrect and a fabrication then I see no alternative now but for Boris Johnson to resign.”
What has the Government said?
Johnson previously claimed that the move to prorogue parliament was normal practice, and dismissed claims that it was undemocratic as “nonsense”.
A Downing Street spokesperson today said that the Government was “disappointed” by the Scottish ruling, adding: “The UK government needs to bring forward a strong domestic legislative agenda. Proroguing Parliament is the legal and necessary way of delivering this.”
An insider at No. 10 later suggested that the Scottish judges might not be impartial - a claim that prompted an immediate backlash. The Downing Street source told The Sun: “We note that last week the High Court in London did not rule that prorogation was unlawful. The legal activists choose the Scottish courts for a reason.”
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard was among those to hit back at the comments, saying it was “dictatorial and dangerous for the prime minister or his office to be questioning the integrity and independence of the Scottish courts just because he doesn’t like what they’ve ruled”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Hollie Clemence is the UK executive editor. She joined the team in 2011 and spent six years as news editor for the site, during which time the country had three general elections, a Brexit referendum, a Covid pandemic and a new generation of British royals. Before that, she was a reporter for IHS Jane’s Police Review, and travelled the country interviewing police chiefs, politicians and rank-and-file officers, occasionally from the back of a helicopter or police van. She has a master’s in magazine journalism from City University, London, and has written for publications and websites including TheTimes.co.uk and Police Oracle.
-
The history of Donald Trump's election conspiracy theories
The Explainer How the 2024 Republican nominee has consistently stoked baseless fears of a stolen election
By David Faris Published
-
Two ancient cities have been discovered along the Silk Road
Under the radar The discovery changed what was known about the old trade route
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
'People shouldn't have to share the road with impaired drivers'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The Tamils stranded on 'secretive' British island in Indian Ocean
Under the Radar Migrants 'unlawfully detained' since 2021 shipwreck on UK-controlled Diego Garcia, site of important US military base
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Britain's Labour Party wins in a landslide
Speed Read The Conservatives were unseated after 14 years of rule
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Will voter apathy and low turnout blight the election?
Today's Big Question Belief that result is 'foregone conclusion', or that politicians can't be trusted, could exacerbate long-term turnout decline
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published