Brexit: what is in the ‘technical non-papers’ given to the EU?

Finnish prime minister warned that if proposals were not sent by end of month ‘it's over’

UK and EU flags
(Image credit: Jack Taylor/Getty Images)

The UK government has revealed that it has passed on “confidential technical non-papers” on Brexit to the EU.

The announcement came after Finland’s Prime Minister Antti Rinne gave Boris Johnson 12 days to come up with a new plan on leaving the bloc.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

A UK government statement has since been released that says: “We have now shared in written form a series of confidential technical non-papers which reflect the ideas the UK has been putting forward.

“We will table formal written solutions when we are ready, not according to an artificial deadline, and when the EU is clear that it will engage constructively on them as a replacement for the backstop.”

However, a government source insisted the development was not in response to Rinne’s remarks and said the documents had been shared “in the last week”, reports the BBC.

One EU source told The Times that the documents included “some ideas and principles on some aspects of the backstop”, but that it was not clear what the “actual idea is”.

Yesterday, after meeting Macron, Rinne told reporters: “If the UK wants to discuss alternatives to the existing Brexit agreement then these must be presented before the end of the month.”

He added that he and Macron are “both concerned about what is happening in Britain right now”, adding: “If no proposals are forthcoming, I believe that quite a few European leaders agree with the position. Then it’s over.”

The Independent says that while Macron and Rinne “do not speak for the whole EU”, the deadline has weight given Rinne is the current holder of the rotating EU Council presidency and “charged with coordinating the views of member states”.

The Guardian points out that a deadline of 30 September would be “highly problematic” for Johnson as it falls on the eve of the Conservative party conference and the prime minister would be wary of showing his hand at such a sensitive point.

Earlier in the day, it was claimed that during his lunch meeting with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, Johnson had expressed shock when he was told of the scale of checks that would still be required under the “SPS” plan the government has mooted for the Irish border to avoid a backstop.

“During talks with Juncker and the EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, the prime minister was shown in detail how allowing Northern Ireland to stick to common EU rules on food and livestock, known as sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS), would still fail to avoid checks on the vast majority of goods that cross the Irish border,” reports The Guardian.

The Finanical Times says Johnson turned to his chief negotiator, David Frost, and the Brexit secretary, Stephen Barclay, and said: “So you’re telling me the SPS plan doesn’t solve the customs problem?”

Although Downing Street has denied the report, EU sources confirmed that Johnson had seemed shocked at the complexity of the situation, and that it appeared to have been a “bit of a reality check to hear it from EU officials”.

The Times says the “non-papers” shared with the EU are “understood to build on Mr Johnson’s earlier offer to create an all-Ireland food-and-agricultural zone with a regulatory border in the Irish Sea to protect the EU’s single market”.

However, it adds that “the EU is being asked to accept a customs tariff border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland without any physical infrastructure on the actual border”.