Trump whistle-blower scandal: did White House engage in cover-up?
Newly released complaint claims officials attempted to ‘lock down’ records of Ukraine call

Senior White House officials have been accused of trying to cover up details of an explosive phone call between Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky which has opened the US president up to potential impeachment.
Washington was rocked last week when an unnamed US intelligence whistle-blower accused the president of “multiple acts” of misconduct including pushing a foreign leader to investigate a domestic political rival.
The revelations prompted Nancy Pelosi, the most senior House Democrat, to announce that the party was pushing ahead with a formal impeachment inquiry against the Republican president.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The scandal further deepened yesterday when it emerged the Trump administration may have attempted to withhold evidence of the call, a blatant obstruction of justice.
So what exactly is going on and what could it mean for Trump?
What are the whistle-blower’s claims?
Much of the controversy centres around Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden. In transcripts of the call released by the White House, Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart to “do me a favour” by investigating unfounded allegations against the former vice president.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
In the newly released complaint, the whistle-blower says this amounts to Trump “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the US 2020 election”.
Trump’s personal Lawyer Rudy Giuliani did little to dampen speculation when he was confronted by CNN anchor Chris Cuomo over whether he had previously asked Ukraine to “look into” former vice president and current presidential hopeful Joe Biden.
“No, actually I didn’t,” Giuliani responded. “I asked the Ukraine to investigate the allegations that there was interference in the election of 2016 by the Ukrainians for the benefit of Hillary Clinton.”
However, when the question was put to him once more seconds later, he responded: “Of course I did.”
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For more political analysis - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Why are there accusations of a cover-up?
The complaint also claims the Trump administration attempted to cover up and withhold evidence relating to the call.
White House lawyers “directed” officials to remove an electronic transcript of the 25 July call from a system where such notes are usually stored, according to the whistle-blower.
They said it was “not the first time under this administration that a presidential transcript was placed into this codeword-level system solely for the purpose of protecting politically sensitive - rather than national security sensitive – information”.
“This set of actions underscored to me that White House officials understood the gravity of what had transpired in the call,” the whistle-blower wrote in the complaint.
The White House has acknowledged the transcript was not necessarily a verbatim account of the exchange between the two leaders.
“The claim – that the White House essentially sought to make notes of that call less accessible – is the most explosive revelation in the whistle-blower complaint which was finally made public on Thursday”, says the Telegraph.
How has Trump responded?
The president has responded in typically disdainful fashion, dismissing the impeachment proceedings as a “hoax” and “witch-hunt”, yet even he seems rattled by the fast-moving developments.
Trump acknowledged that he personally blocked nearly $400m in military aid to Ukraine days before he spoke to Zelensky, but denied any “pressure” was applied, saying the call was “friendly”.
And Congress?
The release of the whistle-blower complaint came as US lawmakers on the House of Representatives intelligence committee began to question Trump's top intelligence official on the issue.
Acting National Intelligence Director Joseph Maguire had initially refused to share the complaint with Congress, prompting accusations from angry Democrats he was seeking to withhold vital evidence.
Jim Himes, a Democratic congressman from Connecticut, told the MSNBC network that Maguire “broke the law when he decided to basically intercept the inspector general’s report to Congress”.
“This has never been done before in the history of inspector general reports to the Congress, and the American people should be worried about that,” he added.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, a Democrat, also excoriated Maguire for not immediately presenting the whistle-blower’s complaint to Congress, as mandated by law.
He went on to say the complaint was evidence of the “graphic betrayal of the president’s oath of office”.
“I think there are any number of potential crimes when a president is soliciting for an assistance again in another presidential election,” he said.
Devin Nunes, the senior Republican on the committee, dismissed the document, “however, cracks were emerging in the Republican support for Trump” says The Times.
Ben Sasse, a senator from Nebraska, said: “American elections should be for Americans. And the idea that we would have foreign nation-states coming into the American electoral process, or the information surrounding an election, is really, really bad.”
Few Republicans have been willing to publicly criticise Trump. However, Mike Murphy, a Republican strategist, claimed that as many as 30 senators would vote to remove Trump from office if a secret ballot were taken.
Elliott Goat is a freelance writer at The Week Digital. A winner of The Independent's Wyn Harness Award, he has been a journalist for over a decade with a focus on human rights, disinformation and elections. He is co-founder and director of Brussels-based investigative NGO Unhack Democracy, which works to support electoral integrity across Europe. A Winston Churchill Memorial Trust Fellow focusing on unions and the Future of Work, Elliott is a founding member of the RSA's Good Work Guild and a contributor to the International State Crime Initiative, an interdisciplinary forum for research, reportage and training on state violence and corruption.
-
Fannie Flagg’s 6 favorite books that sparked her imagination
Feature The author recommends works by Johanna Spyri, John Steinbeck, and more
-
Google: A monopoly past its prime?
Feature Google’s antitrust case ends with a slap on the wrist as courts struggle to keep up with the tech industry’s rapid changes
-
Patrick Hemingway: The Hemingway son who tended to his father’s legacy
Feature He was comfortable in the shadow of his famous father, Ernest Hemingway
-
Supreme Court: Will it allow Trump’s tariffs?
Feature Justices fast-track Trump’s appeal to see if his sweeping tariffs are unconstitutional
-
Venezuela: Was Trump’s air strike legal?
Feature A Trump-ordered airstrike targeted a speedboat off the coast of Venezuela, killing all 11 passengers on board
-
3 killed in Trump’s second Venezuelan boat strike
Speed Read Legal experts said Trump had no authority to order extrajudicial executions of noncombatants
-
Is Kash Patel’s fate sealed after Kirk shooting missteps?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The FBI’s bungled response in the immediate aftermath of the Charlie Kirk shooting has director Kash Patel in the hot seat
-
Russian drone tests Romania as Trump spins
Speed Read Trump is ‘resisting congressional plans to impose newer and tougher penalties on Russia’s energy sector’
-
Trump renews push to fire Cook before Fed meeting
Speed Read The push to remove Cook has ‘quickly become the defining battle in Trump’s effort to take control of the Fed’
-
Will Donald Trump’s second state visit be a diplomatic disaster?
Today's Big Question Charlie Kirk shooting, Saturday’s far-right rally and continued Jeffrey Epstein fallout ramps-up risks of already fraught trip
-
Air strikes in the Caribbean: Trump’s murky narco-war
Talking Point Drug cartels ‘don’t follow Marquess of Queensberry Rules’, but US military air strikes on speedboats rely on strained interpretation of ‘invasion’