How will Syria be carved up?
Donald Trump further confuses situation in Middle East by announcing some US troops may stay in Syria to protect oil

Officials in Washington have hinted at how the world’s major superpowers are planning to carve up Syrian territory in the wake of Turkey’s widely condemned assault on Kurdish positions in the country.
According to The New York Times, US government sources say President Donald Trump is “leaning in favour” of keeping a “small contingent of American troops in eastern Syria” near the Iraqi border.
The plan would “mark the second time in ten months that he has reversed his order to pull out nearly all American troops from the country”, says the newspaper, and would have major ramifications for the region if implemented, with Russia, Syria and Turkey all vying for land - and oil - in the Middle East.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
US Defence Secretary Mark Esper has assured doubters that the American troops left in Syria would “help defend Iraq” and “perform a counter-Isis mission”, but is that all there is to Washington’s plan?
What is the US doing?
Trump announced on Monday that he would leave some US troops in Syria. According to comments later made by Esper, the force could number up to 200 personnel and would be stationed in eastern Syria near the border with Iraq.
The Times reports that the US may also leave some special forces in the Tanf pocket, a stretch of desert on the Jordanian border that 150 US troops are said to be using to monitor Iranian militia activity in southeast Syria.
Reports suggest that the motivation for the continued military presence is to protect oil resources, rather than Kurdish civilians.
Esper said Washington wants to prevent oil falling into the hands of a resurgent Islamic State (Isis), the Associated Press (AP) reports. However, The New York Times says officials claim the move is also designed to “block the advance of Syrian government and Russian forces” into the oil fields.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Esper said he has contacted the Iraqi government about a potential plan to shift about 1,000 troops from Syria into western Iraq, and “did not rule out the idea that US forces would conduct counterterrorism missions from Iraq into Syria”, AP adds.
Nevertheless, Trump tweeted this week: “USA soldiers are not in combat or ceasefire zones. We have secured the Oil. Bringing soldiers home!”
He later told reporters that the US would work out a deal under which some oil revenue would go to the Kurds, and suggested a large oil company could be involved. He also said the US would leave a small number of troops near Jordan at the request of Israel.
“Keep the oil, we want to keep the oil and we will work something out with the Kurds so they have some money, they have some cash flow,” Trump said.
What does it mean for the territory?
The Times reports that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will travel to Russia this week to discuss the limits that President Vladimir Putin has demanded on its incursions into Syrian territory. The move comes as a five-day ceasefire called on Thursday draws to a close on Tuesday evening.
Erdogan had initially declared plans to create a 300-mile “safe zone” on the border of Turkey and Syria, not only to defend from attacks from Syria but also to house two million Syrian refugees whom he intended to repatriate from Turkey.
However, The Wall Street Journal notes that the agreement with Washington covers only about a quarter of Erdogan’s proposed safe zone, and “Moscow’s commitment to securing the remaining three-quarters will be essential because the Russian-backed army of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad last week struck an agreement to work with the Kurdish militia”.
The Times adds that the YPG Kurdish militia in Syria has, since the US first intervened in 2015, “managed to carve out a semi-autonomous state”, but are now “angry” that they will likely “fall back under the sway of the regime of President Assad in return for help in warding off the invasion” from Turkey.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Critics push back as the government goes after Job Corps
The Explainer For at-risk teens, the program has been a lifeline
-
5 horror movies to sweat out this summer
The Week Recommends A sequel, a reboot and a follow up from the director of 'Barbarian' highlight the upcoming scary movie slate
-
Bryan Burrough's 6 favorite books about Old West gunfighters
Feature The Texas-raised author recommends works by T.J. Stiles, John Boessenecker, and more
-
Is Trump giving up on Ukraine-Russia peace?
Today's Big Question White House says president is 'weary and frustrated' with conflict
-
Trump drops ceasefire demand after Putin call
speed read Following a phone call with Russia's president, Trump backed off an earlier demand that Putin agree to an immediate ceasefire with Ukraine
-
Israel-US 'rift': is Trump losing patience with Netanyahu?
Today's Big Question US president called for an end to Gaza war and negotiated directly with Hamas to return American hostage, amid rumours of strained relations
-
Kurdish PKK militia to disband for Turkey talks
speed read The Kurdistan Workers' Party will disarm after four decades of armed conflict with Turkey, putting an end to 'one of the longest insurgencies in the Middle East'
-
On VE Day, is Europe alone once again?
Today's Big Question Donald Trump's rebranding of commemoration as 'Victory Day for World War Two' underlines breakdown of post-war transatlantic alliance
-
Putin talks nukes as Kyiv slated for US air defenses
speed read 'I hope they will not be required,' Putin said of nuclear weapons on Russian state TV
-
US, Ukraine sign joint minerals deal
speed read The Trump administration signed a deal with Ukraine giving the US access to its mineral wealth
-
Ukraine-US minerals deal: is Trump turning away from Putin?
Today's Big Question US shows 'exasperation' with Russia and signs agreement with Ukraine in what could be a significant shift in the search for peace