Drivers could be entitled to millions of pounds in refunds after an independent motoring charity accused private parking companies of issuing fines illegally.
The RAC Foundation has accused private parking companies of handing out fines that are disproportionate to the losses suffered by drivers parking on private land.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The motoring charity argues that the current ticketing system is "barely regulated" and drivers continue to be "short-changed" by private companies.
In 2012 clamping or towing a vehicle without lawful authority on private land was outlawed in an attempt to end abuses by rogue clamping firms. However, the charity says that overstay fines were effectively being used as an alternative.
The RAC Foundation's director, Professor Stephen Glaister, says millions of drivers could be due a refund when the report is tested in court. He estimates that drivers may have been overcharged by £100m in 2013 alone.
"We would like to see this legal argument tested in a higher court so that a binding precedent is set," he told the Daily Telegraph.
He is calling on the government to do "what it should have done at the outset" and set out what constitute reasonable charges. "Ministers thought that the ban on clamping would end parking problems on private land. As we warned at the time, they were wrong."
Motoring lawyer Brian Koffman welcomed the report, saying drivers often feel they have no chance of contesting such fines. "Many just give in and think they will pay it". Reaching a decision on this area of public law is, he believes, "in the public interest."
A Department for Transport spokesperson said the government has been clear about wanting to see an end to unfair parking practices and that it is firmly "on the side of the motorist".
-
August 23 editorial cartoonsCartoons Saturday's political cartoons include deficit dimness, steamroller-in-chief, and more
-
5 museum-grade cartoons about Trump's Smithsonian purgeCartoons Artists take on institutional rebranding, exhibit interpretation, and more
-
Settling the West Bank: a death knell for a Palestine state?In the Spotlight The reality on the ground is that the annexation of the West Bank is all but a done deal
-
Home Office worker accused of spiking mistress’s drink with abortion drugSpeed Read Darren Burke had failed to convince his girlfriend to terminate pregnancy
-
In hock to Moscow: exploring Germany’s woeful energy policySpeed Read Don’t expect Berlin to wean itself off Russian gas any time soon
-
Were Covid restrictions dropped too soon?Speed Read ‘Living with Covid’ is already proving problematic – just look at the travel chaos this week
-
Inclusive Britain: a new strategy for tackling racism in the UKSpeed Read Government has revealed action plan setting out 74 steps that ministers will take
-
Sandy Hook families vs. Remington: a small victory over the gunmakersSpeed Read Last week the families settled a lawsuit for $73m against the manufacturer
-
Farmers vs. walkers: the battle over ‘Britain’s green and pleasant land’Speed Read Updated Countryside Code tells farmers: ‘be nice, say hello, share the space’
-
Motherhood: why are we putting it off?Speed Read Stats show around 50% of women in England and Wales now don’t have children by 30
-
Anti-Semitism in America: a case of double standards?Speed Read Officials were strikingly reluctant to link Texas synagogue attack to anti-Semitism
