Russia simulated nuclear attack on Sweden, says Nato
Military and intelligence units targeted in war game 'attack' that caught Swedes napping

Russia targeted Sweden in a simulated nuclear attack during exercises in 2013, Nato has confirmed, as worries about Moscow's military build-up continue.
The admission comes in the newly released annual report for 2015 from Nato's secretary general Jens Stoltenberg. The incident was reported in Sweden and further afield at the time but this is the first confirmation from the organisation.
"As part of its overall military build-up, the pace of Russia's military manoeuvres and drills have [sic] reached levels unseen since the height of the Cold War," Stoltenberg, a former prime minister of Norway, wrote.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"Over the past three years, Russia has conducted at least 18 large-scale snap exercises, some of which have involved more than 100,000 troops.
"These exercises include simulated nuclear attacks on Nato Allies (eg, ZAPAD [a large-scale Russian military exercise]) and on partners (eg March 2013 simulated attacks on Sweden)," he added.
According to the Daily Telegraph, the attack saw two Tupolev Tu-22M3 strategic bombers, escorted by four Sukhoi Su-27 jet fighters, cross the Gulf of Finland on 29 March.
The Russian planes came within 24 miles of Swedish territory off the island of Gotland, 100 miles from Stockholm. After apparently completing dummy bombing runs, the planes veered off to avoid violating Swedish air space.
Their "targets" are said to have included a military base in southern Sweden and the headquarters of the country's signals intelligence agency, which is outside Stockholm.
The incident caused controversy at the time, says the paper, because the Russians essentially caught the Swedes napping. They had no advance warning and no aircraft ready to scramble to monitor the incoming aircraft. Instead, they had to rely on Danish planes which shadowed the Russians.
Russia has not commented officially on the Nato claim but the Telegraph spoke to Evgeny Buzhinsky, a former general who now heads the Moscow-based PIR think tank, who said it was "nonsense designed to stir up hysteria about the Baltic states".
He added: "This statement about a supposed nuclear strike on Sweden is nothing more than a provocation."
Since Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine two years ago, there have been fears it might use the presence of Russian-speaking minority groups in the Baltic states as an excuse to invade.
Buzhinsky told the Telegraph this was not going to happen, however, and that there would be no strategic advantage to taking control of Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania, nor were the Russian speakers there going to ask for "protection".
But he warned any increase of Nato's military presence in the region would be a "reason for concern from the Russian side" and would be met tit-for-tat.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How Zohran Mamdani's NYC mayoral run will change the Democratic Party
Talking Points The candidate poses a challenge to the party's 'dinosaur wing'
-
Book reviews: '1861: The Lost Peace' and 'Murderland: Crime and Bloodlust in the Time of Serial Killers'
Feature How America tried to avoid the Civil War and the link between lead pollution and serial killers
-
Brian Wilson: the troubled genius who powered the Beach Boys
Feature The musical giant passed away at 82
-
How far would Russia go for Iran?
Today's Big Question US air strikes represent an 'embarrassment, provocation and opportunity' all rolled into one for Vladimir Putin
-
Are the UK and Russia already at war?
Today's Big Question Moscow has long been on a 'menacing' war footing with London, says leading UK defence adviser
-
Is UK's new defence plan transformational or too little, too late?
Today's Big Question Labour's 10-year strategy 'an exercise in tightly bounded ambition' already 'overshadowed by a row over money'
-
What are the different types of nuclear weapons?
The Explainer Speculation mounts that post-war taboo on nuclear weapons could soon be shattered by use of 'battlefield' missiles
-
Ukraine-Russia: is peace deal possible after Easter truce?
Today's Big Question 'Decisive week' will tell if Putin's surprise move was cynical PR stunt or genuine step towards ending war
-
What's behind Russia's biggest conscription drive in years?
Today's Big Question Putin calls up 160,000 men, sending a threatening message to Ukraine and Baltic states
-
Is the 'coalition of the willing' going to work?
Today's Big Question PM's proposal for UK/French-led peacekeeping force in Ukraine provokes 'hostility' in Moscow and 'derision' in Washington
-
Russia's spies: skulduggery in Great Yarmouth
In the Spotlight 'Amateurish' spy ring in Norfolk seaside town exposes the decline of Russian intelligence