The British government has warned lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender citizens of the risks of travelling to two US states in the wake of new legislation.
Legislation passed in Mississippi, meanwhile, effectively allows individuals and organisations to use religion to justify discrimination against LGBT citizens.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
As a result, new advice from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) states: "The US is an extremely diverse society and attitudes towards LGBT people differ hugely across the country. Laws vary from state to state."
It goes on to warn: "LGBT travellers may be affected by legislations passed recently in the states of North Carolina and Mississippi."
Ty Cobb, from America's Human Rights Campaign, says it is "both frightening and embarrassing that one of our nation's staunchest allies has warned its citizens of the risks" of travelling to the states.
"It is now more clear than ever that these terrible measures are not only harming individuals and taking an economic toll on the states, but are also causing serious damage to our nation's reputation, and the perceived safety of LGBT people who travel here," he added.
Dr Felicity Daly, from the LGBT Kaleidoscope Trust, told The Independent that it "is heartening the FCO is becoming more LGBT responsive in their work – it's a good sign as it is an important issue in the UK".
The updated travel warning was published on the eve of President Barack Obama's visit to the UK. The White House has previously described the bill as "mean-spirited" and is considering whether to withdraw billions of dollars in federal aid in response.
"[It] represents a test for the Obama administration, which has declared that the fight for gay and transgender rights is a continuation of the civil rights era," says the New York Times. "The North Carolina dispute forces the administration to decide how aggressively to fight on that principle."
-
Starbucks workers are planning their ‘biggest strike’ everThe Explainer The union said 92% of its members voted to strike
-
‘These wouldn’t be playgrounds for billionaires’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The 5 best nuclear war movies of all timeThe Week Recommends ‘A House of Dynamite’ reanimates a dormant cinematic genre for our new age of atomic insecurity
-
Trans prisoners: a ‘conflict of rights’?Talking Point Case of where to house trans woman convicted of rape causes uproar in Scotland
-
Home Office worker accused of spiking mistress’s drink with abortion drugSpeed Read Darren Burke had failed to convince his girlfriend to terminate pregnancy
-
‘Breaking the law is a resigning matter’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
-
In hock to Moscow: exploring Germany’s woeful energy policySpeed Read Don’t expect Berlin to wean itself off Russian gas any time soon
-
Were Covid restrictions dropped too soon?Speed Read ‘Living with Covid’ is already proving problematic – just look at the travel chaos this week
-
‘No-fault divorce is an indescribable relief’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
-
Inclusive Britain: a new strategy for tackling racism in the UKSpeed Read Government has revealed action plan setting out 74 steps that ministers will take
-
Sandy Hook families vs. Remington: a small victory over the gunmakersSpeed Read Last week the families settled a lawsuit for $73m against the manufacturer
