Parrot's squawk mooted as evidence in murder trial
Prosecutor believes repetitive phrase, 'don't f****ing shoot', may be dead man's last words
A prosecutor in Michigan is considering whether the words of a pet parrot could be used as evidence to try a woman accused of killing its owner.
Bud, a 19-year-old African grey parrot, has been repeating the words "don't f****ing shoot" ever since his owner, Martin Duram, was shot multiple times and killed in Sand Lake, Michigan, in May 2015, reports The Guardian.
"He's using Marty's voice," said Duram's ex-wife, Christina Keller who now owns the bird.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"It imprinted in his brain, and he can't let it go," Keller told WOOD TV in Detroit. [[{"type":"media","view_mode":"content_original","fid":"96673","attributes":{"class":"media-image"}}]]
Newaygo County prosecutor Robert Springstead told the Detroit Free Press: "It is something we are going to be looking at to determine if it's reliable to use or if it's information we need to prosecute this case."
However, Springstead acknowledged that calling the bird as a witness may not be possible. He said he "highly doubts there is any precedent" for using a bird's speech as evidence. When a judge asks someone to raise their right hand, he wondered, "to a parrot, are you raising a wing, a foot?"
Nevertheless, he added: "It's an interesting novelty and it's been a great opportunity for me to learn about African parrots."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It would not be the first time a parrot's statement has been considered for use in a murder trial, notes the Daily Telegraph.
In 1993 a North California defence lawyer argued that an African Grey who said repeatedly "Richard, no, no, no" suggested that his client – namely Gary Joseph Rasp – was not the perpetrator, but the judge ruled that the evidence could not be used and Rasp was convicted.
-
Le Pen back in the dock: the trial that’s shaking FranceIn the Spotlight Appealing her four-year conviction for embezzlement, the Rassemblement National leader faces an uncertain political future, whatever the result
-
The doctors’ strikesThe Explainer Resident doctors working for NHS England are currently voting on whether to go out on strike again this year
-
5 chilling cartoons about increasing ICE aggressionCartoons Artists take on respect for the law, the Fourth Amendment, and more
-
Panama and Canada are negotiating over a crucial copper mineIn the Spotlight Panama is set to make a final decision on the mine this summer
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult
-
Iran cuts internet as protests escalateSpeed Reada Government buildings across the country have been set on fire
-
US nabs ‘shadow’ tanker claimed by RussiaSpeed Read The ship was one of two vessels seized by the US military
-
How Bulgaria’s government fell amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
-
Brazil’s Bolsonaro behind bars after appeals run outSpeed Read He will serve 27 years in prison
-
Americans traveling abroad face renewed criticism in the Trump eraThe Explainer Some of Trump’s behavior has Americans being questioned