The US Congress has voted to override President Barack Obama's veto of a bill allowing families of the victims of the 9/11 terror attacks to sue Saudi Arabia.
The legislation "grants an exception to the legal principle of sovereign immunity in cases of terrorism on US soil, clearing the way for lawsuits seeking damages from the Saudi government", Reuters says.
Lawmakers in both the Senate and the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in favour of reversing the veto. This is first time this has happened during Obama's presidency, which has less than four months to go.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Democrats in "large numbers" sided with Republicans to deliver "a remarkable rebuke to the President", the New York Times says. The final tallies were a 97 to one vote in the Senate and 348 to 77 in the House.
"Asking us to stand between 9/11 families and their day in court is asking a lot," said Democratic Senator Chris Coons.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest delivered an "uncharacteristically blunt" response after the Senate vote, calling it the "single most embarrassing thing the Senate has done since 1983".
Obama vetoed the bill over fears it would "undermine US-Saudi relations" and open the door for "tit-for-tat lawsuits against US service members in places like Afghanistan and Iraq", the BBC says. "The United States relies on principles of immunity to prevent foreign litigants and foreign courts from second-guessing our counterterrorism operations and other actions that we take every day," he said.
Overruling the veto was "basically a political vote", Obama said yesterday.
"It's an example of why sometimes you have to do what's hard and, frankly, I wish Congress here had done what's hard," he said. "If you're perceived as voting against 9/11 families right before an election, not surprisingly, that's a hard vote for people to take. But it would have been the right thing to do."
-
Political cartoons for January 18Cartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include cost of living, endless supply of greed, and more
-
Exploring ancient forests on three continentsThe Week Recommends Reconnecting with historic nature across the world
-
How oil tankers have been weaponisedThe Explainer The seizure of a Russian tanker in the Atlantic last week has drawn attention to the country’s clandestine shipping network
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
What is the Donroe Doctrine?The Explainer Donald Trump has taken a 19th century US foreign policy and turbocharged it
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
The US-Saudi relationship: too big to fail?Talking Point With the Saudis investing $1 trillion into the US, and Trump granting them ‘major non-Nato ally’ status, for now the two countries need each other
-
‘The money to fix this problem already exists’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump defends Saudi prince, shrugs off Khashoggi murderSpeed Read The president rebuked an ABC News reporter for asking Mohammed bin Salman about the death of a Washington Post journalist at the Saudi Consulate in 2018
-
Trump says he will sell F-35 jets to Saudi ArabiaSpeed Read The president plans to make several deals with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman this week
-
‘This estrangement from death has beget euphemisms’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
