MPs recommend tougher scrutiny for private firms
Work and pensions committee calls for action to prevent another BHS collapse
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Private firms should face the same rules on corporate governance as publicly listed companies, a committee of MPs is to recommend.
The changes would force private companies with more than 5,000 defined benefit pension scheme members to abide by the Financial Reporting Council's code. They are aimed at preventing another collapse similar to that of retail chain BHS.
Labour MP Frank Field, the chairman of the work and pensions committee, said the collapse of the high street store was triggered by "gross failures of corporate governance".
Article continues belowThe Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
He added: "The finances and leadership of a company with so many people depending on it should be open to scrutiny.
"For a company with a big social and economic footprint like BHS it is simply not enough to be accountable to shareholders - particularly when one shareholder owns most of the stock."
Field's committee "also called for changes that would make directors at private businesses accountable to pensioners through their scheme's trustees", says the BBC.
The MPs' report came as it was revealed that leading city investors will propose the creation of a "sin bin" for companies that overstep the mark on bosses' pay, says the Daily Telegraph.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Under proposals expected to be submitted to ministers this week, a company would automatically face a binding vote on pay at its next annual general meeting if more than a quarter of shareholders protest against pay awards in a given year.