Online gambling firms 'could be breaking the law'
Companies are 'loading the dice' against new customers, warns regulator
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Online gambling firms and the owners of casino websites are "likely to be breaking consumer law" and could face court action, the competition watchdog warned.
Following a nine-month investigation, the Consumer and Markets Authority (CMA) said "some punters did not get the deal they expected from sign-up promotions offering cash bonuses", reports the BBC.
Regulators also said gambling companies were "unfairly holding on to people's money".
Article continues belowThe Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Nisha Arora, senior director for consumer enforcement at the CMA, said: "New customers are being enticed by tempting promotions only to find the dice are loaded against them.
"And players can find a whole host of hurdles in their way when they want to withdraw their money."
The CMA said it had "identified a number of operators engaging in practices likely to be breaking consumer law" and was talking to firms to agree remedial action. Without this, it warned, it could pursue court action.
It specifically highlighted the problem of "matched bets", where the site matches the amount the customer stakes. If £10 is bet, for example, it adds another £10 to double the stake.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
"However," says the BBC, "in the terms and conditions of play it might state that the customer has to play several hundred times within a certain period of time before they can cash in their winnings."
Ultimately, by forcing people to play for an extended period, the firms are increasing the chance that the customer will lose or par any winnings.
Other issues identified when the inquiry was launched included hidden exclusion clauses that disqualified people from withdrawing their winnings and changes to odds made without the customer's knowledge.