Attractive people ‘more likely to be conservative’
‘Halo effect’ means beautiful people more likely to see the benefits of individualism
In upsetting news for single progressives, a new study claims that attractive people are more likely to embrace right-wing politics than their plainer counterparts.
US political science professors Rolfe Peterson and Carl Palmer examined multiple past studies which included data on participants’ political affiliation and perceived physical attractiveness.
Their findings, published in Politics and the Life Sciences, show that those deemed more aesthetically blessed are consistently more likely to identify as Republican.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Peterson said that the correlation is rooted in a cognitive bias called the halo effect in which one positive trait, such as beauty, is subconsciously associated with unrelated, positive traits, such as intelligence or morality.
A previous study by Peterson and Palmer into the political implications of the “halo effect” found that attractive people are also perceived as more politically knowledgeable.
Cushioned by the halo effect, attractive people “tend to get on better in life”, Peterson writes, and “when we are treated differently we begin to perceive the world differently”.
In some cases, the social privileges which accompany good looks result in an empathy gap when it comes to understanding the hardships of others, says The Guardian. Attractive people are thus “more likely to embrace individualism and reject the types of social assistance and welfare aid more commonly promoted by leftwing policy”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
“Put another way,” ponders The Times’ science editor Tom Whipple, “if Karl Marx had had a better beard, would 20th-century history have been rather different?”
Peterson stresses that his findings highlight a tendency rather than a strict correlation.
Physical beauty “gives a person a small push in the conservative direction”, he writes. “All attractive people are not conservative and not all unattractive people are liberals.”
-
Why is the Pentagon taking over the military’s independent newspaper?Today’s Big Question Stars and Stripes is published by the Defense Department but is editorially independent
-
How Mars influences Earth’s climateThe explainer A pull in the right direction
-
‘The science is clear’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult
-
Iran cuts internet as protests escalateSpeed Reada Government buildings across the country have been set on fire
-
US nabs ‘shadow’ tanker claimed by RussiaSpeed Read The ship was one of two vessels seized by the US military
-
How Bulgaria’s government fell amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
-
Brazil’s Bolsonaro behind bars after appeals run outSpeed Read He will serve 27 years in prison
-
Americans traveling abroad face renewed criticism in the Trump eraThe Explainer Some of Trump’s behavior has Americans being questioned
-
Nigeria confused by Trump invasion threatSpeed Read Trump has claimed the country is persecuting Christians