Science teacher accused of feeding live puppy to turtle pleads not guilty

Robert Crosland denies animal cruelty over ‘regrettable’ incident in biology classroom

Common Snapping Turtle
A snapping turtle
(Image credit: Getty Images)

An Idaho science teacher has entered a plea of not guilty to charges of animal cruelty after being accused of feeding a live puppy to a snapping turtle in front of horrified students.

Robert Crosland, who kept exotic animals in a tank in his biology class at Preston Junior High School, was charged in June after several parents came forward to complain about the incident.

He will stand trial in October and, if convicted, faces up to six months in jail or a fine of up to $5,000 (£3,700).

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.


Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

In a statement released shortly after the alleged incident took place in March, the Preston school district acknowledged the “regrettable” circumstances of the after-school turtle feeding, although it did not directly address reports that a live puppy was involved.

“We hope that any errors in judgment made by a teacher in this instance will not cause us to forget the years of care, effort and passion the teacher has given to the students of the Preston School District,” the statement added.

At least one former student appeared to support this stance, telling East Idaho News that Crosland was “a cool teacher who really brought science to life”.

Nonetheless, “several online petitions called for Crosland to be fired, and one now has more than 198,000 signatures” the Idaho Statesman reports, noting that a petition in support of Crosland has attracted a less impressive 3,900 signatures.

The snapping turtle at the centre of the controversy was confiscated by Department of Agriculture officials and later euthanised.

However, officials stressed that, contrary to claims circulated by outraged animal-lovers, the euthanasia was not a “punishment” for the alleged incident but was mandatory under the Invasive Species Act, designed to protect local wildlife from predation or diseases from non-native species.

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us