What will be different about Trump’s historic second impeachment?
Senior Republicans less keen to protect their president at unprecedented new Senate trial

Donald Trump has made history by becoming the first president to be impeached twice, after Congress voted to take action in the wake of last week’s riot on Capitol Hill.
The House of Representatives voted 232-197 yesterday to begin impeachment proceedings against the president, with ten Republicans breaking ranks to side with Democrats in backing a second Senate trial.
Trump is charged with “incitement of insurrection” amid allegations of “encouraging violence with his false claims of election fraud”, the BBC reports. And while the president was acquitted less than a year ago at the conclusion of his last Senate trial, his former allies appear less inclined to back him this time around.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Back in the dock
Impeachment charges are political, rather than criminal, and have political repercussions. If found guilty, Trump would be barred from holding federal office in the future, ending any plans he might have to run for the White House again in 2024.
Congress has cited a speech given by Trump on 6 January to supporters outside the White House in which he told them to “peacefully and patriotically” make their voices heard, but also to “fight like hell” against the result of November’s presidential election, which he has repeatedly claimed was fraudulent.
As The Guardian notes, Wednesday’s vote marks the “most bipartisan impeachment in American history”, with Republican members of Congress lining up to condemn the president.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The vote has opened a faultline within the GOP, however, with “freshman” lawmakers “feuding with each other” over the charges, the paper continues.
Indeed, this second impeachment is taking place against a backdrop of Republic divisions not seen during the first, when the vote in Congress was split along party lines. This time, “some of the most high-profile members of Republican leadership aren’t denouncing the Democratic effort”.
More widely, the row over impeachment has seen “Washington devolve into a miasma of suspicion and conflict”, says The New York Times. During the pre-vote debate, “a Democratic member of Congress accused Republican colleagues of helping the mob last week scout the building in advance”, while some GOP members “sidestepped magnetometers intended to keep guns off the House floor”.
Judge McConnell presiding
Trump is now facing a trial in the Senate. Republican majority leader Mitch McConnell has said that the trial will not begin before Joe Biden’s inauguration next week.
However, the hugely influential Republican senator “signaled through advisers Tuesday that he would be open to a possible conviction”, reports The Washington Post.
In a statement posted on Twitter yesterday, McConnell said “there was simply no chance that a fair or serious trial could conclude” before Biden takes over the White House on 20 January.
The three previous impeachment proceedings have taken 83, 37 and 21 days respectively, McConnell points out.
All the same, his apparent willingness to open to impeachment marks a huge difference between this second Democratic effort and Trump’s trial in 2020.
“How things will shake out in the Senate is a mystery,” says The Guardian. But “this time it’s conceivable a few more Republicans could join Democrats, though they need 17 to convict”.
During last year’s trial, only Senator Mitt Romney voted with Democrats against Trump. But McConnell’s suggestion that he could conceive of the president having committed impeachable offences could move the dial.
“I have not made a final decision on how I will vote and I intend to listen to the legal arguments when they are presented to the Senate,” he said in a letter sent to fellow GOP senators.
As The Guardian notes, such comments from the most powerful Republican on Capitol Hill are “a far cry” from the stance taken by Trump’s party during his first impeachment.
Joe Evans is the world news editor at TheWeek.co.uk. He joined the team in 2019 and held roles including deputy news editor and acting news editor before moving into his current position in early 2021. He is a regular panellist on The Week Unwrapped podcast, discussing politics and foreign affairs.
Before joining The Week, he worked as a freelance journalist covering the UK and Ireland for German newspapers and magazines. A series of features on Brexit and the Irish border got him nominated for the Hostwriter Prize in 2019. Prior to settling down in London, he lived and worked in Cambodia, where he ran communications for a non-governmental organisation and worked as a journalist covering Southeast Asia. He has a master’s degree in journalism from City, University of London, and before that studied English Literature at the University of Manchester.
-
Today's political cartoons - March 30, 2025
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - strawberry fields forever, secret files, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 hilariously sparse cartoons about further DOGE cuts
Cartoons Artists take on free audits, report cards, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Following the Tea Horse Road in China
The Week Recommends This network of roads and trails served as vital trading routes
By The Week UK Published
-
Why does Donald Trump want Greenland?
The Explainer Trump is not the only US president who has tried to gain control of Greenland
By The Week UK Published
-
What dangers does the leaked Signal chat expose the US to?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House's ballooning group chat scandal offered a masterclass in what not to say when prying eyes might be watching
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump sets 25% tariffs on auto imports
Speed Read The White House says the move will increase domestic manufacturing. But the steep import taxes could also harm the US auto industry.
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Even authoritarian regimes need a measure of public support — the consent of at least some of the governed'
instant opinion 'Opinion, comment and editorials of the day'
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
Waltz takes blame for texts amid calls for Hegseth ouster
Speed Read Democrats are calling for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and national security adviser Michael Waltz to step down
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
USPS Postmaster General DeJoy steps down
Speed Read Louis DeJoy faced ongoing pressure from the Trump administration as they continue to seek power over the postal system
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Judge: Nazis treated better than Trump deportees
speed read U.S. District Judge James Boasberg reaffirmed his order barring President Donald Trump from deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'There is a certain kind of strength in refusing to concede error'
instant opinion 'Opinion, comment and editorials of the day'
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published