Russians blamed for leaking Mueller probe evidence
Material released in an attempt to discredit special counsel’s investigation, say prosecutors

US prosecutors have revealed that evidence gathered by special counsel Robert Mueller’s office was obtained by Russians and leaked online, according to a court filing yesterday.
Mueller’s office says that more than 1,000 files it had given to lawyers for indicted Russian hackers “later appeared to have been uploaded to a filesharing site and promoted by a Twitter account”, The Guardian says.
USA Today says the information that was released had been “altered and disseminated as part of a disinformation campaign”, aimed at discrediting Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Twitter account @HackingRedstone, which announced that the content had been released to the public, has since been taken down by the social media platform.
“We’ve got access to the Special Counsel Mueller’s probe database as we hacked Russian server with info from the Russian troll case. You can view all the files Mueller had about the IRA [Russia’s Internet Research Agency] and Russian collusion. Enjoy the reading!” the tweet said.
Mueller’s office confirmed that the file structure and file names were a match to those used by the investigating team.
“FBI investigators had found no evidence that government servers holding the data had been hacked, according to Mueller’s team, pointing instead to a leak on the Russian side,” says The Guardian.
The Wednesday filing came in response to a request by Russian firm Concord Management & Consulting to “share documents with colleagues in Russia”, while the company fights federal charges, the Wall Street Journal says.
Mueller is prosecuting Concord Management, which is accused of funding hacking operations by the IRA.
Mueller’s office asked the court not to grant the request to share documents, saying it “unreasonably risks the national security interest of the United States”.
It added: “The person who created the webpage used their knowledge of the non-sensitive discovery to make it appear as though the irrelevant files contained on the webpage were the sum total evidence of ‘IRA and Russian collusion’ gathered by law enforcement in this matter in an apparent effort to discredit the investigation.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Operation Rubific: the government's secret Afghan relocation scheme
The Explainer Massive data leak a 'national embarrassment' that has ended up costing taxpayer billions
-
Melania Trump's intervention on Ukraine
In The Spotlight The first lady has been linked to the president's u-turn on sending arms to Kyiv
-
The Retrievals, series two: 'essential listening'
The Week Recommends The second instalment of this hard-hitting podcast delves into the 'appallingly common injustice' of women having C-sections without pain relief
-
Trump threatens Russia with 'severe tariffs'
speed read The president also agreed to sell NATO advanced arms for Ukraine
-
Trump U-turns on weapons to Ukraine
Speed Read Unhappy with Putin, Trump decides the US will go back to arming Ukraine against Russia's attacks
-
IAEA: Iran could enrich uranium 'within months'
Speed Read The chief United Nations nuclear inspector, Rafael Grossi, says Iran could be enriching uranium again soon
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?
today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Iran nukes program set back months, early intel suggests
Speed Read A Pentagon assessment says US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites only set the program back by months, not years. This contradicts President Donald Trump's claim.
-
Trump gives himself 2 weeks for Iran decision
Speed Read Trump said he believes negotiations will occur in the near future
-
What would a US strike on Iran mean for the Middle East?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION A precise attack could break Iran's nuclear programme – or pull the US and its allies into a drawn-out war even more damaging than Iraq or Afghanistan
-
US says Trump vetoed Israeli strike on Khamenei
Speed Read This comes as Israel and Iran pushed their conflict into its fourth day