What Biden shares with Bush
One of the more aggravating features of the U.S. debate over Afghanistan has been the sudden prominence of former officials of the George W. Bush administration. People like Condolezza Rice, Michael Gerson and Peter Wehner, among others, have used their platforms to condemn and criticize President Biden — as though they themselves didn't have a part in persuading the United States to invade Iraq, one of the worst debacles in American foreign policy history. Sometimes it's better just to keep quiet.
Inadvertently, though, they have highlighted an unfortunate truth about the Afghanistan situation. President Biden has made the same mistake getting out of war that Bush did in starting one: Their respective administrations didn't fully prepare themselves — or the public — for the possibility of everything going wrong.
The blunders of the Bush White House have long been documented. Among them: Then-Vice President Dick Cheney told the country that Americans would be greeted as liberators. It lowballed estimates of how many troops would be needed to stabilize postwar Iraq. Most egregiously, it oversold the case for going to war — ostensibly to prevent Saddam Hussein from acquiring weapons of mass destruction. As it turned out, there were none. The American public, prepared for a quick and easy invasion, eventually revolted as the enterprise turned into a bloody and prolonged quagmire.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On Wednesday, President Biden told ABC News that getting out of Afghanistan was always going to be messy. "The idea that somehow, there's a way to have gotten out without chaos ensuing, I don't know how that happens," Biden said. But that's not quite what he said just last month, rejecting a reporter's comparison to the fall of Saigon. "There's going to be no circumstance where you see people being lifted off the roof of an embassy in the — of the United States from Afghanistan," he said then. "It is not at all comparable." He might've believed that — as late as last week, the Pentagon was projecting Kabul would fall within 90 days. The end, of course, came much more quickly.
American presidents are not good at preparing the public for worst-case scenarios. They're also often prone to believe their own happy talk. But things go wrong. Disasters happen. Plans don't work out. Our leaders would serve themselves, and the public, much better if they were forthright about those possibilities.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Is Europe finally taking the war to Russia?Today's Big Question As Moscow’s drone buzzes and cyberattacks increase, European leaders are taking a more openly aggressive stance
-
How coupling up became cringeTalking Point For some younger women, going out with a man – or worse, marrying one – is distinctly uncool
-
The rapid-fire brilliance of Tom StoppardIn the Spotlight The 88-year-old was a playwright of dazzling wit and complex ideas
-
Memo signals Trump review of 233k refugeesSpeed Read The memo also ordered all green card applications for the refugees to be halted
-
Will California tax its billionaires?Talking Points A proposed one-time levy would shore up education and Medicaid
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
Is Trump a lame duck president?Talking Points Republicans are considering a post-Trump future
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Nick Fuentes’ Groyper antisemitism is splitting the rightTalking Points Interview with Tucker Carlson draws conservative backlash
-
Is Mike Johnson rendering the House ‘irrelevant’?Talking Points Speaker has put the House on indefinite hiatus
-
Will Republicans kill the filibuster to end the shutdown?Talking Points GOP officials contemplate the ‘nuclear option’
