Will a Taliban-ruled Afghanistan be a safe haven for terrorism?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f12b/6f12bfbae62996af266996457e3049e2d34c231b" alt="The Taliban"
One of the main objections to America's withdrawal from Afghanistan is that it will make Americans less safe — that terrorist groups will find safe haven from which to spring new attacks on U.S. soil. Didn't we invade Afghanistan in the first place in order to end the threat from al Qaeda, after all?
"There's no question that the return of the Taliban opens up space in this new Islamic emirate for al Qaeda to return, rebuild a base, and for other groups associated or previously associated with al Qaeda, like ISIS, to return to the region," Jamil Jaffer, executive director of the National Security Institute at George Mason University, told The Hill last week.
But there are a couple of reasons to think these fears are overblown.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The first is that an American military presence doesn't always discourage or stop terrorism — it can generate it. The U.S. invasion of Iraq helped birth ISIS, for example, both by destabilizing the country and by radicalizing the population against foreign occupiers. And the man behind 9/11, Osama bin Laden, was motivated to wage war against the United States in part because American troops remained in Saudi Arabia after the first Gulf War against Iraq in 1991. A smaller American footprint abroad might actually make our country a smaller target.
It's also the case that 9/11 was an act of stateless terrorism. Al Qaeda may have made its base in Afghanistan, but the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, and Egypt. Some of them plotted the attack in Hamburg, Germany, then sought flight training at schools in Florida and Arizona. The ubiquity of technology means that potential terrorists can and do become radicalized via email and social media from anywhere on the planet. That's a problem, but it means that planting an army in Kabul with the intent of holding it forever is an expensive and probably ineffective way to stop terrorism.
None of this is to say America will be free from terrorism going forward, or that the Taliban's quick victory won't have ugly consequences. But it does mean that the downsides of leaving Afghanistan aren't quite so clear as the hawks would have it.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
North Korea (sort of) welcomes tourists again
Under the Radar 'Hermit kingdom' allows foreign visitors for the first time since 2020 – but only in limited areas
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Today's political cartoons - February 23, 2025
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - loser's game, unexpected consequences, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 slow on the draw cartoons about Democrats' response to Trump
Cartoons Artists take on taking a stand, staying still as a statue, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Will Trump lead to more or fewer nuclear weapons in the world?
Talking Points He wants denuclearization. But critics worry about proliferation.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why Trump and Musk are shutting down the CFPB
Talking Points And what it means for American consumers
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Are we now in a constitutional crisis?
Talking Points Trump and Musk defy Congress and the courts
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What can Democrats do to oppose Trump?
Talking Points The minority party gets off to a 'slow start' in opposition
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Five things Biden will be remembered for
The Explainer Key missteps mean history may not be kind to the outgoing US president
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
Palestinians and pro-Palestine allies brace for Trump
TALKING POINTS After a year of protests, crackdowns, and 'Uncommitted' electoral activism, Palestinian activists are rethinking their tactics ahead of another Trump administration
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published