The right's boilerplate indignation on Afghanistan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8a78/c8a781a89cd8413f3e449415d605b03d95f3ad84" alt="An angry man."
You've all seen it — a conservative publication lambasting the president about how his recent decisions have brought on "a national humiliation." "The American capitulation will … embolden others around the world" to test "the new administration's mettle." That's why it's so important for members of Congress to demand that the president take steps "to repair the damage already done" to our credibility. We need to recognize that "angry words and congressional resolutions of disapproval are now worse than useless … unless backed by deeds." Anything less than decisive action will only confirm "American weakness" in the eyes of the world.
Harsh words for Joe Biden? Not quite. The blistering criticism appeared in April of 2001, in the pages of the now-defunct Weekly Standard magazine. The new president drawing the ire was none other than Republican George W. Bush, who had run for office promising a more restrained foreign policy than the one promised by Bill Clinton's vice president Al Gore. The occasion of the editorial? A long-forgotten minor standoff with China in which an American spy plane was forced to land by a Chinese fighter jet. Five months later, terrorists from Al Qaeda would attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and the skirmish with China would be forgotten. And because President Bush responded to the 9/11 attacks exactly as the Weekly Standard would have wished, conservative periodicals trained their harshest rhetoric elsewhere for the next seven years.
They were back focused on the Oval Office once Barack Obama settled into the job and began diverging from conservative nostrums about the need for full-spectrum toughness and willful resolution — in Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Cuba.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Donald Trump's presidency presented a complicated case. Normally a Republican would receive deference from conservatives, but Trump was no ordinary Republican on foreign policy. At the same time, the 45th president was outsmarted by members of his own administration, who ensured the U.S. broke less from standard Republican policy preferences than he would have liked. That's why Trump's efforts to withdraw from Afghanistan never came to fruition.
But Biden followed through, and for that he has become a target, just like pre-9/11 Bush and Obama before him. Withdrawal from Afghanistan is a national humiliation. An utter disgrace. Evidence to our friends and enemies alike of our lack of credibility. An invitation for bad actors everywhere to seek advantage of our fecklessness. A guarantee our opponents will be emboldened and reinvigorated. And so on. And so forth.
Be aggressive. Flex muscles. Act tough. Never reassess or pull back. That's the sum total of mainstream conservative thinking on foreign policy. It's hawkish boilerplate. And so are the criticisms of those who dare to diverge from it.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Damon Linker is a senior correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is also a former contributing editor at The New Republic and the author of The Theocons and The Religious Test.
-
5 exclusive cartoons about Trump and Putin negotiating peace
Cartoons Artists take on alternative timelines, missing participants, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The AI arms race
Talking Point The fixation on AI-powered economic growth risks drowning out concerns around the technology which have yet to be resolved
By The Week UK Published
-
Why Jannik Sinner's ban has divided the tennis world
In the Spotlight The timing of the suspension handed down to the world's best male tennis player has been met with scepticism
By The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump lead to more or fewer nuclear weapons in the world?
Talking Points He wants denuclearization. But critics worry about proliferation.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why Trump and Musk are shutting down the CFPB
Talking Points And what it means for American consumers
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Are we now in a constitutional crisis?
Talking Points Trump and Musk defy Congress and the courts
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What can Democrats do to oppose Trump?
Talking Points The minority party gets off to a 'slow start' in opposition
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Five things Biden will be remembered for
The Explainer Key missteps mean history may not be kind to the outgoing US president
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
Palestinians and pro-Palestine allies brace for Trump
TALKING POINTS After a year of protests, crackdowns, and 'Uncommitted' electoral activism, Palestinian activists are rethinking their tactics ahead of another Trump administration
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published