Democrats need to reform the Senate now — before Republicans do

Several recent developments have brought into stark relief the fact that our Senate is a smoking jalopy of an institution that is badly in need of reform, even after Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) moved to weaken the filibuster several months ago. And if Democrats don't get to it first, then count on Republicans beating them to the punch if they ever manage to wrest control of the government.

First, a banal bipartisan measure in favor of energy efficiency went down to a threatened Republican filibuster because the GOP insisted on stringing a bunch of EPA-crippling amendments to it. Second, when Federal Reserve Board member Jeremy Stein steps down at the end of the month, the board of the world's most important central bank will be down to just three out of seven members. There are three Fed nominations waiting for Senate confirmation, but it could take weeks or months to get to them.

All these failures are due to the janky and anachronistic institutions of the Senate.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Let's start with the filibuster. Here's what went down on the efficiency bill:

So Republicans threatened to filibuster and the bill died. Add one more good idea to the corpse heap of GOP filibusters.

People tend to blame this on some vague idea of "politics," but there's simply no way to get the politics out of our legislature. The operation of the legislative body is practically the definition of politics. No, our problem is crappy, pointless roadblocks that get in the way of the politics.

Senate Democrats weakened the filibuster for nominations, but not for legislation. But at this point there's simply no reason for the filibuster to exist at all, other than to thwart an entire presidential agenda that a minority happens to disagree with. Ditto the "blue slip" rule and the sucking morass of procedural hurdles that eat up time and prevent executive branch nominees from being considered.

A quick up-or-down vote works for nearly every other democratic institution in the entire world. It will work for the Senate. And it's flat-out embarrassing to have our most powerful economic committee less than half-filled due to anti-democratic obstructionism.

Time is running out for this administration. If the Republicans take the Senate in the midterm elections (a distinct possibility), then that will probably be the end of confirming anyone but reactionaries until 2016 at the earliest. President Obama's inexplicably lax attention to the federal bureaucracy is possibly his single greatest weakness, and it is clearly threatening his legacy.

As Jamelle Bouie details in a sharp post today, Republicans will almost certainly sweep aside whatever precedent stands between them and stacking every open lifetime appointment with the most radically conservative twenty-somethings they can scrounge up. The blue slip rule, which enables a single senator to hold up a nomination, has been repeatedly abused by conservatives, resulting in Obama nominating the conservative Michael Boggs to a federal court. Here's Bouie:

In reality, the Senate's vaunted traditions are already near death. The question is who will kill them off first. The Democrats should get it over with, and get a bit of desperately needed governing done in the process.