Obama’s foreign policy: Gates’s mixed review
In a newly published memoir, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates gives a firsthand account of the president's decisions regarding the Middle East.
“How did the Obama administration’s foreign policy process get so broken?” said David Ignatius in The Washington Post. In a “devastating” memoir published this week, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates gives a firsthand account of the internal infighting, indecision, and political calculations behind Obama’s confused policies regarding Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Middle East. (For a review of the book itself, see Books.) In what has to be “the least surprising bombshell ever to appear in a tell-all Washington memoir,” said Rich Lowry in NYPost.com, Gates reveals that President Obama was deeply ambivalent about his own decision in 2009 to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan. At the time, Gates says, he realized that Obama “doesn’t believe in his own strategy and doesn’t consider the war to be his. For him, it’s all about getting out.” One can only imagine how this news will be received by the families of the roughly 1,500 U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan since Obama took office. “If you don’t believe in it, don’t fight it.”
But Gates doesn’t argue that Obama was wrong about Afghanistan, said Rod Dreher in TheAmericanConservative.com. In fact, he acknowledges that Obama turned out to be right in his big foreign policy decisions. Gates praises Obama’s courage and decisiveness, especially in ordering the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. His main criticism seems to be that Obama was not “a True Believer,” with a passionate commitment to waging war. But isn’t the commander in chief supposed to be torn about sending more Americans into harm’s way? Gates seems to prefer the leadership style of President Bush, said Andrew Sullivan in Dish.AndrewSullivan.com, who, Gates writes, “had no second thoughts about Iraq, including our decision to invade.” This assessment is “close to deranged.” Surely we’re better off with a president who’s a “sober skeptic” about the ability of American military action to fix the Middle East than a “True Believer pursuing impossible goals.”
Ambivalence and political expedience, however, make for bad policy, said Matthew Lee in RealClearDefense.com. Obama seems to have “settled on a largely hands-off, do-no-harm approach” to the Middle East that has left the U.S. “rudderless and reactive” as Islamic extremism returns with a vengeance. Obama’s “lack of commitment to the war on terror” has had dire results, said Michael Goodwin in the New York Post. Thanks to his failure to keep any troops in Iraq or intervene in Syria, al Qaida now controls a 400-mile swath of territory from Aleppo to Fallujah.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Nonetheless, Obama’s foreign policy vision has been clear and consistent from the start, said Marc Ambinder in TheWeek.com.After the catastrophe of Iraq, and the endless war in Afghanistan, in 2008 the American people elected a man who openly disdained the neoconservative enthusiasm for “getting into these wars and staying, leaving a big American footprint.” Obama’s no isolationist, but he believes that reckless, indefinite, and bloody overseas adventures leave the U.S. weaker, not stronger, and most Americans agree with him. Gates admits he does, too, said Jay Bookman in AJC.com. His main complaints seem to be about Obama’s cool, controlling style, and his lack of fervor for the wars he inherited. But after the last decade, anyone who could be confident about “military victory” in that part of the world “just wasn’t paying attention.” Here’s to second thoughts.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
5 immersive books to read this April for a brief escape
The Week Recommends A dystopian tale takes us to the library, a journalist's ode to her refugee parents and more
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
'The winners and losers of AI may not be where we expect'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Shingles vaccine cuts dementia risk, study finds
Speed Read Getting vaccinated appears to significantly reduce the chances of developing Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published