The Week contest: Nuclear option
Republicans can no longer filibuster presidential nominations, a rules change that many called the "nuclear option." What would be a better term for what the Democrats just did?

This week's question: Senate Democrats recently amended the rules so that minority Republicans can no longer filibuster presidential nominations with just 41 votes — a rules change that many called the "nuclear option." Since that clichéd phrase is a bit melodramatic for a rules change, what would be a better term for what the Democrats just did?
RESULTS:
THE WINNER: Killabuster
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Robert J. Reed, Galesburg, Ill.
SECOND PLACE: No judge left behind
Bob Peffers, San Antonio
THIRD PLACE: The bluster-buster
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Andrew Stritch, Sherbrooke, Quebec
HONORABLE MENTIONS:
Bench pressing
William Bernsau, Jacksonville, Fla.
Common sense
Lynn Goldberg-Gursky, Enola, Pa.
New lids on the block
John D. Thompson, Pella, Iowa
Curb Your Antagonism Option
Kathy El-Assal, Middleton, Wis.
The "majority rules" rule
Kenneth R. Updegrove, Cedaredge, Colo.
Blockbuster
Alan Fraker, Greenfield, Mass.
Mutual Assured Destruction
Kevin Morgado, New Bedford, Mass.
Unblockaid
Charles Joyner, Burlington, N.C.
Bob Bowen, Claremont, N.H.
The murder/suicide option
Cindy Cornell, Burlingame, Calif.
No dis appointment
Bill Klein, Appomattox, Va.
Disarmament
Sandra Bagnatori, San Francisco
Karma
Alfie Alschuler, Amherst, Mass.
The majority riles
Michael Maloney, Concord, N.H.
Republockin
Colby Seibold, Vancouver, Wash.
Zero Dark Forty-one
Judy Echols, Incline Village, Nev.
The Did Something Senate
John Clark, Eaton, Ohio
The 51 percent solution
Lance Cooper, Brewster, N.Y.
-
The Chelsea Townhouse: London luxury feels right at home
The Week Recommends This boutique hotel strikes the right note between sophisticated and cosy
-
What are the different types of nuclear weapons?
The Explainer Speculation mounts that post-war taboo on nuclear weapons could soon be shattered by use of 'battlefield' missiles
-
Floral afternoon teas to enjoy during the Chelsea Flower Show
The Week Recommends These are the prettiest spots in the city to savour a traditional treat
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy