Issue of the week: The true cost of the shutdown
Now we know: “Shutdowns aren’t cheap.”
Now we know: “Shutdowns aren’t cheap,” said Josh Hicks in WashingtonPost.com. The forced paralysis of the U.S. government for 16 days cost an estimated $24 billion in lost economic output, according to Standard & Poor’s, or 0.6 percent in annualized economic growth. That showed up in different ways: some $2.4 billion in lost travel spending, for instance, and $450,000 per day in lost revenue at shuttered national parks. It’s over for now, but we may not be out of the woods yet. “As most politics junkies know, the government could soon shut down again if Congress and the White House cannot agree to another spending plan early next year.” S&P is among those warning that the threat alone could dampen consumer spending, pointing to “another humbug holiday season.”
Calm down, said Jeffrey Dorfman in RealClearMarkets.com. “The economy will suffer no loss from the government shutdown.” Yes, some businesses that make money from visitors to Washington, D.C., or federal sites elsewhere have suffered, along with some idled federal contractors. “But any losses in one part of the economy will be offset by gains somewhere else.” Tourists who didn’t spend money at national parks will spend it somewhere else. Government employees will get back pay and will catch up on “any spending they did not do during the shutdown.” All the money that wasn’t spent, in other words, doesn’t disappear, but winds up getting spent a little later or saved, and savings also benefit the economy. “While the shutdown may not have accomplished anything other than disrupting many people’s lives, it did not cause damage to the national economy.”
In fact, it has left lasting scars, said The New York Times in an editorial. In light of the higher payroll taxes and federal spending cuts imposed at the end of last year, everyone expected the economy to get off to a sluggish start this year. “The only consolation” was that forecasters expected better conditions later in the year. Thanks to the government shutdown, “that’s not going to happen.” Political brinkmanship of the sort we’ve experienced these days “sows uncertainty,” spurring investors to demand higher interest rates and doing lasting damage to the economy. “President Obama took the right path by refusing to negotiate” with Republicans’ unreasonable demands, but his challenge now “is not only to undo the damage” but also to get us back on the recovery track.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The real cost of this debacle isn’t expressed in dollars, said Gerald F. Seib in The Wall Street Journal. “Washington’s misadventures have extracted a historically high toll on America’s confidence.” The feeling that our leaders “are botching the job of managing the government’s finances” sends shock waves through the country, starting “an un-virtuous cycle, in which jittery consumers pull back, causing businesses to scale back investment and hiring plans.” Gallup’s daily gauge of consumer confidence has already plunged dramatically. Our politicians should take note of the harm they’ve done “to the national psyche” and finally move to “a sane and functional budget process.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Issue of the week: Do high-speed traders rig the market?
feature Wall Street is abuzz over high-frequency trading.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: How Yellen spooked the markets
feature At her first press conference, the new Federal Reserve chair made the mistake of indicating when the Fed would raise interest rates.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Stop calling women ‘bossy’
feature Let’s ban “She’s bossy.” Instead, let’s try, “She has executive leadership skills.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: GM’s recall disaster
feature Mary Barra is facing “her first big test” since she took over as GM’s new CEO in January: a recall of more than 1.6 million vehicles.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Who gets Fannie’s and Freddie’s profits?
feature Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s shareholders want their money back.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Comcast buying Time Warner Cable
feature Has Comcast won the cable wars?
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: AOL’s million-dollar babies
feature AOL’s “gaffe-prone” CEO, Tim Armstrong, “got in some hot water” last week.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Why Google unloaded Motorola
feature Three years after shelling out $12.5 billion for Motorola, Google announced its sale to Lenovo Group for $2.9 billion.
By The Week Staff Last updated