It's OK to overreact to shootings in Washington

Capitol Hill security
(Image credit: (REUTERS/Gary Cameron))

The "active shooter" situation that wasn't paralyzed downtown Washington today, and as of this writing, there are still heightened security measures in place. The panicked reaction to reports of what happened began after the incident itself was resolved; the suspect apparently had been killed, and a police officer was being tended to, and those on the scene did not find any reason to believe that more people were involved.

On CNN, anchors raised questions about security measures, and whether they were up to the task of protecting the U.S. government. Fox News has already concluded that security worked. Both networks are justified in their informed speculation.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

I'm no fan of security theater, or of the militarization of the police, or of post-9/11 panic-stoking by the news media. But when there's even a remote possibility of an attack, however small or improbable, on two branches of government, overreaction is warranted. The scenarios portrayed in movies like White House Down and Olympus Has Fallen do not happen in real-life, until such a day that they do.

The Secret Service, Capitol Police, Park Police, and Washington, D.C. police have prepared and rehearsed for all sorts of unknown troubles; the biggest X factor is simply trying to respond proportionately when there is no way of knowing what is actually happening; whether one event is connected to another, or whether others are yet to come. Interoperability between those agencies is better, but not perfect. And until the voice of God says, "This is only a crazy person trying to ram her car into a White House perimeter stanchion and nothing else," I'm fine if the Secret Service triggers contingency plans while it prepares for something much worse.

Securing important people is an important duty of these agencies, but collectively they protect the continuity of the entire U.S. government. (This week, the non-government, but that's a technicality.) I'm the first person to say, "Chill out, guys" when an airplane breaches the air defense zone around the capital region; the event is routine and commonplace. But the ADIZ is not there for theater; it's there because it protects the U.S capital from attack. If that means I have to evacuate a building for a while, or listen to television anchors speculate about tweets that get information wrong, I'm OK with that.

Explore More

Marc Ambinder is TheWeek.com's editor-at-large. He is the author, with D.B. Grady, of The Command and Deep State: Inside the Government Secrecy Industry. Marc is also a contributing editor for The Atlantic and GQ. Formerly, he served as White House correspondent for National Journal, chief political consultant for CBS News, and politics editor at The Atlantic. Marc is a 2001 graduate of Harvard. He is married to Michael Park, a corporate strategy consultant, and lives in Los Angeles.