Republicans: Boycotting NBC and CNN
The Republican National Committee hit back at the networks over their plans to air biographies of Hillary Clinton.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Republicans are no longer willing to be patsies for the liberal media, said Emily Miller in The Washington Times. The Republican National Committee last week hit back at NBC and CNN over their plans to air major retrospectives about the life of Hillary Clinton, approving a resolution that bans the networks from hosting any 2016 primary debates unless they scrap these public-relations efforts for the likely Democratic nominee. “We’re done putting up with this nonsense,” said RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, blasting the projects as “extended commercials” for Clinton. Priebus is “no doubt right about the bent of the Hillary programs,” said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. NBC’s miniseries will star Diane Lane as the former First Lady, “and you can bet she’ll come off as a sympathetic and glamorous heroine.” CNN’s documentary will likely be similarly flattering to its subject. But liberal media bias is a fact of political life, and Priebus’s boycott will only create the impression that “he’s acting as Lord Republican Media Censor.”
The GOP’s boycott isn’t really about Hillary Clinton, said Byron York in WashingtonExaminer.com. Priebus’s real agenda is to limit the number of primary debates and seek more conservative-friendly moderators. In the 20-plus debates of Republican candidates in 2011 and 2012, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, et al descended into an endless series of attacks on each other, creating “more bloodletting, division, and sometimes embarrassment for the party than enlightenment of voters.” Next time, the GOP will strictly control the debate season, so that it helps—not hurts—its eventual nominee.
Good luck with that! said Andy Ostroy in HuffingtonPost.com. Granted, the GOP stands a better chance of winning elections “if it stops its candidates from actually speaking.” But the 2012 election results strongly suggest that the party has a dire need “to expand its reach among voters,” nor further limit it to “the rabid conservatives watching Fox News.” It’s also a terrible idea to allow only conservative commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin to moderate debates, said Jamelle Bouie in TheDailyBeast.com. They’ll demand the candidates swear allegiance “to the unpopular, right-wing beliefs of their audiences”—including hatred of reproductive rights, Muslims, and Hispanic immigrants. “In which case, it will be all the problems of last year’s primaries, amplified, and turned up to 11.”
Article continues belowThe Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com