3 signs Rand Paul may not be ready for primetime

At this early stage of the 2016 presidential race, when no politician has yet declared his or her candidacy, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is benefiting from an awful lot of buzz. And in a recent poll of New Hampshire, he trailed only New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

As a potential candidate, every interview Paul gives from now on will be parsed with an eye toward 2016. And yesterday, he talked with Bloomberg's Joshua Green to discuss Washington and the policies behind his "libertarian populism."

So how did he do? Columnists on the left (and at least one on the right) think Paul's performance was pretty subpar. Here are three signs that he may not quite be ready for primetime.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

1. His case for gutting the budget leaves much to be desired

Green asked Paul about an article that claims his budget would eliminate the State, Energy, and Commerce Departments, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration.

"Many Americans who have suffered during a recession have had to cut their spending 1 percent, and they didn't like doing it, but they were able to do it to get their family's finances back in order," Paul replied. "I see no reason why government can't cut 1 percent of its spending."

While folksy, equating massive budget cuts to simple household budgeting isn't particularly illuminating, argues The Washington Post's Ezra Klein:

2. He's warning of a phantom trillion-dollar deficit

Later, to justify those proposed cuts, Paul cited "a trillion-dollar deficit every year," saying, "I mean, that's an extremely bad situation."

But there is no trillion-dollar deficit, says Paul Krugman of The New York Times, who puts the number at "$600 billion and falling fast."

"I think it's pretty clear that Paul actually has no idea that the deficit is falling," Krugman writes, adding:

3. He's joking about picking dead economists to head the Fed

Paul wants to shutter the Federal reserve. And he made that point with a joke:

Ross Douthat, conservative columnist for The New York Times, is not amused:

New York's liberal columnist Jonathan Chait also takes issue with Paul's stance: