Will Obama's snub of Putin win points with Republicans?
Republicans have to decide which they like less: Edward Snowden's protector or praising Obama

President Barack Obama's refusal to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of September's G-20 summit might not have earned him any friends in Moscow — but is it winning him political points with Republicans in Congress?
Officially, the White House canceled the president's meeting with Putin due to a "lack of progress on issues such as missile defense and arms control, trade and commercial relations, global security issues, and human rights and civil society in the last 12 months."
To the press, however, the cold shoulder boils down mostly to one factor: Russia's decision to grant NSA leaker Edward Snowden asylum.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Some Republicans have praised the Obama administration for throwing some shade Putin's way.
"This should help make clear that the Russian government's giving Edward Snowden 'refugee' status is unacceptable," said Ed Royce (R-Calif.), chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee. "Snowden should be sent to the U.S. to defend his actions in a U.S. court of law.”
Royce isn't the only Republican who is talking tough on Russia. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) originally suggested that the United States boycott the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, if the country granted Snowden asylum.
But just because many Republicans don't like Putin and Snowden, however, doesn't mean they are ready to praise Obama.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The office of House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) took the time to call Obama's announcement a big political fail, saying, "The president's signature foreign policy accomplishment from the first term — a reset with Russia — has just collapsed."
Others lambasted the president for not being the alpha dog in this dispute.
"It'd be nice if Russia and the United States could be friendly rivals," Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said Wednesday on Fox News. "But this relationship, because of weakness, because of the president’s policy of leading from behind, where we don’t have the respect of Russia and, quite honestly, most countries in the world — this has been an utter failure and we need to recognize this and move forward with something far more important than just not meeting with Putin."
Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), also speaking on Fox News, expressed a similar criticism:
When you sit down and negotiate with someone like Putin, who is former KGB I would add, you want to have a strong hand and you want to be the dominant personality, and those two things are very important. If they neither fear you nor respect you, it's going to be awfully hard to talk them into letting Snowden come back into the United States ...
Putin looks into the eyes of Barack Obama and he would understand, if there was a strong personality there, a strong leader, and someone who was willing to put out a strategy, he would react to that. But instead, he’s pushing back on the United States…it's hard for us to maintain our image in the world if we let him continue. [The Hill]
Despite the bluster at home, Russian officials have, at least publicly, shown little anger over the canceled visit. That could be due to the fact that the world leaders will talk anyway when the G-20 summit kicks off in St. Petersburg.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has defended Snowden in the past, put the whole ordeal in perspective on Geraldo Rivera's radio show, saying, "We're not at the heights of the Cold War, neither is this the missile crisis, so in the end I don’t think this will be that big a deal."
Keith Wagstaff is a staff writer at TheWeek.com covering politics and current events. He has previously written for such publications as TIME, Details, VICE, and the Village Voice.
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published