Name recognition is apparently everything in politics
Anthony Weiner and Eliot Spitzer are beating their lesser-known competitors, sex scandals be damned

A new Quinnipiac poll confirms that it is better to be hated, or at least infamous, than to be ignored, as disgraced former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer (D) and former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D) are officially leading their respective races.
Spitzer, running for New York City comptroller, is beating Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer by a healthy margin of 48-33. That is incredible for someone who jumped into the race barely more than a week ago.
Why aren't people punishing Spitzer at the polls for his involvement in a 2008 prostitution scandal? Probably because they barely know who Stringer, or any of the other candidates, are. In fact, it would be surprising if a majority of New Yorkers even knew what the comptroller does. Spitzer has, at least for the media, spiced up what is normally a very unsexy race.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Weiner's race is different. The mayor of New York City often becomes a celebrity and potential presidential candidate, while wielding power over more people than the governor of Massachusetts.
Polls show Weiner with a three-point lead over New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, a popular Bloomberg protégé who is no stranger to press attention herself.
Weiner has better name recognition that Quinn. Before he was caught tweeting lewd pictures of himself, he was a regular on national television, including repeated appearances on The Daily Show. After the scandal, he was a regular punchline in late-night monologues and on the front page of the New York Post. He never left the news cycle.
In politics, that apparently matters more than remaining scandal-free, note The Atlantic Wire's Connor Simpson and Philip Bump:
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Other than those two, polled citizens were practically indifferent to every other choice. When pollsters were asked to pass a favorable or unfavorable opinion about the candidates, Weiner and Spitzer are the only two whose "haven't heard enough" scores came in under 20 percent. No one knows who the other guys are. [The Atlantic Wire]
Of course, the idea that name recognition matters isn't new. We have had two presidents with the last name Bush and Hillary Clinton is polling ahead of her potential competition for the presidency in 2016. But it's so much more pronounced in the New York City mayor and comptroller races because of the relative obscurity of Weiner's and Spitzer's competition.
Yes, Bush's famous name helped him win in 2000, but at least people knew who Al Gore was. Few people, even New Yorkers, could probably name any facts about Weiner's and Quinn's closest competitor, former New York City Comptroller William Thompson.
The conventional wisdom used to be that a sex scandal would ruin your political ambitions. That no longer seems to be true.
Keith Wagstaff is a staff writer at TheWeek.com covering politics and current events. He has previously written for such publications as TIME, Details, VICE, and the Village Voice.
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published