Why the fight over Arkansas' new 12-week abortion ban is just getting started
Arkansas passes the most restrictive abortion ban in the United States, prompting vows of legal challenges from the ACLU and other abortion-rights supporters
![Sen. Jason Rapert, who sponsored the Human Heartbeat Protection Act, speaks in the senate chamber, in Little Rock, March, 5.](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/T5CyQUZJTv2pMqQbwk63HM-415-80.jpg)
Yesterday, Arkansas passed the Human Heartbeat Protection Act, which bans abortions after 12 weeks. The bill had already been vetoed by Democratic governor Mike Beebe, but the Arkansas House overrode his veto by a vote of 56-33, putting into law the most restrictive abortion ban in the country.
Not that anti-abortion activists can rest easy. As Rita Sklar, executive director of the ACLU Arkansas, told Politico: "We are preparing the papers to go to court as we speak. In fact, we've been working on them since the bill was filed."
In other words, abortions-rights supporters already have their legal responses planned out. This includes the Center for Reproductive Rights, which, in a statement released today, said they would "fight this offensive law to the end to make sure that women in Arkansas and the surrounding states have access to the safest, high-quality reproductive health care, a right that is protected by the U.S. Constitution."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Even those who support the content of the bill are worried it will fail to hold up in court. James Bopp Jr., a prominent anti-abortion lawyer, is certain lower courts will rely upon past Supreme Court rulings and rule the law unconstitutional, telling the New York Times, "As much as we would like to protect the unborn at that point, it is futile and it won't save any babies."
In fact, one of the reasons why Gov. Mike Beebe vetoed the law in the first place was because he thought it was "blatantly unconstitutional." The same day that Arkansas passed its law, a federal court struck down a law in Idaho that would ban abortions after 20 weeks. As in Idaho, legislators in Arkansas attempted to use fetal-homicide laws, which charge murderers of pregnant women with the death of the unborn child, to justify the abortion ban. Arkansas Rep. Ann Clemmer told the Washington Times that she believes the bill could survive a court challenge because the state's fetal-homicide law treats a 12-week-old fetus as a person and, therefore, "there are two people involved now."
A legal challenge before the law takes effect this summer is just about guaranteed. And such wrangling in court will be expensive. According to The Associated Press, Beebe is concerned about how much the legal battles over this and a 20-week ban he vetoed earlier will cost taxpayers, citing when Arkansas had to pay "nearly $148,000 to attorneys for plaintiffs who successfully challenged a 1997 late-term abortion ban." Republican members of the Arkansas House don't seem concerned about the money, though. "Not the governor, nor anyone else other than the courts, can determine if something is constitutional or unconstitutional," Rep. Bruce Westerman said in urging his colleagues to override Beebe. The governor's got a fight.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Keith Wagstaff is a staff writer at TheWeek.com covering politics and current events. He has previously written for such publications as TIME, Details, VICE, and the Village Voice.
-
Magazine solutions - August 2, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - August 2, 2024
By The Week Staff Published
-
Magazine printables - August 2, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - August 2, 2024
By The Week Staff Published
-
'In a normal country, their activities wouldn't even be crimes'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published