Foreign policy: The missing debate
Has foreign policy ever “been more absent” in a presidential campaign?
Virtually every day, another U.S. soldier dies in Afghanistan, said Fred Hiatt in The Washington Post. Several more were killed last week as Republicans held their convention in Tampa. Yet in his acceptance speech, Mitt Romney did not once utter the word “Afghanistan”—even to thank the 68,000 troops who remain deployed there under increasingly hostile conditions. President Obama, meanwhile, is conducting that war with “split-the-baby ambivalence,” ordering a major surge of 30,000 new troops in 2010 while simultaneously setting 2014 as the U.S.’s departure date. What’s his rationale for sacrificing more of our brave young men and women in a war we’ll soon abandon? Has foreign policy ever “been more absent” in a presidential campaign?
Earlier on, Romney did try to score some foreign policy points, said Nicholas Burns in The Boston Globe. He made the mistake of running to Obama’s right, hurling “thunderbolts against Russia and China” and portraying Obama as “weak-willed and lily-livered.” But this line of attack flopped: Most voters know that Obama killed Osama bin Laden, that he’s waging “an unrelenting campaign against terrorists” in a drone war in Pakistan, and that his diplomatic approach to Iran isn’t much different from the Bush administration’s. Even Republicans can’t agree on what they’d want a President Romney to do abroad, said Brian Katulis in The New York Times.Tea Party neo-isolationists have had enough of expensive foreign wars, and want no part of an intervention in Syria or war with Iran. The party’s neoconservatives, on the other hand, clamor for confrontation not only with Iran, but with Russia and China too. As a sop to them, Romney has proposed adding $2 trillion in defense spending over 10 years—while also somehow cutting taxes and reducing the debt.
Here’s the truth about Romney’s foreign policy, said Trudy Rubin in The Philadelphia Inquirer. It “would likely wind up looking much like Obama’s.” He’d face the same set of bad choices in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Syria. If he backed an attack on Iran, the entire Middle East would be destabilized. As for Romney’s call to jack up defense spending, that will fade if he enters the White House, because “the numbers simply will not add up.” It’s easy to “talk tough” on foreign policy, but projecting American power abroad is now more difficult than ever. Maybe that’s why Romney would rather not talk about it at all.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The countries around the world without jury trials
The Explainer Legal systems in much of continental Europe and Asia do not rely on randomly selected members of the public
-
How did the Wagner Group recruit young British men for arson attack?
Today's Big Question Russian operatives have been using encrypted messaging apps to groom saboteurs across Europe
-
The best graphic novels
The Week Recommends These inventive illustrated books will transport you to another world
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidents
The Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: which party are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?