White House leak investigation
The president denied that his administration leaked national security secrets and asked the attorney general to investigate.
President Obama has denied allegations that his administration deliberately leaked national security secrets to the media, and was forced last week to ask Attorney General Eric Holder to launch a thorough investigation. Republicans accused the White House of feeding detailed, classified information to reporters at The New York Times about how the president personally approves drone attacks on terrorists on a CIA “kill list,” and about U.S.-Israeli cyberattacks against Iran’s nuclear program. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said the disclosures were intended to “enhance the president’s image.” But Obama said it was “offensive�� to suggest the leaks were deliberate. “If we can root out folks who have leaked, they will suffer consequences,” he said.
Obama’s denials are implausible, said Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com. The Times’ “kill list” story, for example, boasted of interviews with “three dozen” Obama officials, and was stuffed with “glorifying details only those very close to Obama could possibly know,” such as how he reads Thomas Aquinas’s philosophical writings on waging a “just war’’ when deciding which terrorists to vaporize. It can’t be coincidence that every revelation portrayed Obama as a “strong, bold, unflinching” president.
If the White House “isn’t willing or able to plug its holes,” said the New York Post in an editorial, then we need a real criminal investigation, instead of Holder’s face-saving sham. Detailed exposures of our national security operations endanger our soldiers and intelligence agents overseas. Obama should appoint a special prosecutor, so that leakers in his administration face the threat of jail time for their “slow-motion treason.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Our problem isn’t too many leaks, said Denver Nicks in TheDailyBeast.com, but too many secrets. We classify core aspects of our foreign policy, from the CIA’s drone program to our covert wars in Iran and Yemen, while giving the some 1 million people in our national security apparatus “more access to more secrets than ever before.” That has made leaks “not only inevitable but necessary.” They’re the only way Americans can find out what’s being done in their names.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Trump vs. China: another tariff U-turn?
Today's Big Question Washington and Beijing make huge tariff cuts, as both sides seek 'exit ramp' from escalating trade war
-
Syria's Druze sect: caught in the middle of Israeli tensions
The Explainer Israel has used attacks on religious minority by forces loyal to Syria's new government to justify strikes across the border
-
Athens city and beach: The Dolli at Acropolis and Cape Sounio
The Week Recommends Luxury living in two Grecotels designed to showcase ancient Greek ruins and modern Greek style
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy