Bain: ‘Vampire’ capitalism on trial
In November, American voters will choose between two "competing visions of capitalism."
Mitt Romney is a jobs destroyer—not a jobs creator, said Devin Banerjee in Bloomberg.com. That’s the central message of President Obama’s latest campaign ad, which attempts to undermine Romney’s claim that his business experience makes him more qualified to fix the economy. The ad attacks Romney’s former venture-capital firm, Bain Capital, for buying and destroying a company called GST Steel in Kansas City, Mo. Some 750 employees lost their livelihoods and pensions, while Bain walked away with a $12 million profit. “It was like a vampire,” says one former worker in the emotionally powerful ad. “They came in and sucked the life out of us.” That’s a direct hit on Romney’s “most vital asset”—his claim to be a competent businessman, said Jamelle Bouie in The American Prospect. In reality, he’s an amoral plutocrat who made Bain’s investors and himself rich, while throwing ordinary workers out on the street.
Bain didn’t loot GST Steel—it gave “a dying steel plant an unexpected eight-year lease on life,” said Kimberley Strassel in The Wall Street Journal. Unable to compete with cheap Chinese steel, GST was facing closure when Bain bought it in 1993. The private equity firm poured $100 million into modernization, but after all that effort, it had no choice but to let the mill go bankrupt in 2001—two years after Romney left Bain. “This is the story of a failed rescue, not vampire capitalism,” said David Brooks in The New York Times. Firms like Bain are vital to our economy; they buy ailing companies with the aim of reforming outdated, inefficient operations and making them competitive again. Research shows that most companies taken over by private equity firms succeed, and become more productive than their rivals. So why not bring that principle of “creative destruction” into government, and bring some sanity and efficiency to our bloated public sector?
In this election, “American capitalism is on trial,” said Robert Samuelson in The Washington Post. Obama maintains that “capitalism has become more predatory and exploitative”; to restore some balance, he wants more regulation, higher taxes on the rich, and more protection for average workers. Romney and corporate leaders, on the other hand, say that taxes and regulation impede investment and job creation. By getting government out of the way, we’d get faster economic growth. “When Americans vote in November, they will unavoidably choose between these competing visions of capitalism. It’s a fateful debate.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why Rikers Island will no longer be under New York City's control
The Explainer A 'remediation manager' has been appointed to run the infamous jail
-
California may pull health care from eligible undocumented migrants
IN THE SPOTLIGHT After pushing for universal health care for all Californians regardless of immigration status, Gov. Gavin Newsom's latest budget proposal backs away from a key campaign promise
-
Is Apple breaking up with Google?
Today's Big Question Google is the default search engine in the Safari browser. The emergence of artificial intelligence could change that.
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy