3 reasons Congress sounds less intelligent than ever
Politicians in the House and Senate are speaking at a 10th grade level, down an entire grade level since 2005. But the test used to assess their language may be flawed

The language employed by members of Congress in their public speeches has fallen a whole grade level in the last seven years, according to a new study. Using the Flesch-Kincaid test, which assigns higher grade levels for the use of longer words and more complex sentences, the Sunlight Foundation concluded that the average lawmaker speaks at a 10th grade level, down from the 11th grade level in 2005, but still two or three grades higher than the typical American. Why do our elected leaders sound like high school sophomores? Here, three explanations:
1. Extremism makes lawmakers sound stupid
"Polarization has changed the way that members of Congress vote," says Suzy Khimm at The Washington Post. And "it may also be changing the way they talk." Moderate politicians typically speak at the highest grade levels, while those at the extremes speak at the lowest. And "newer members are also likely to speak more simply than more senior ones." Just a few years ago, Republicans sounded smarter than Democrats. But as the GOP has veered to the far right, Congress has been flooded by insurgent freshman Republicans who rank near the bottom of the linguistic scale, dragging down the class average.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. Politicians are just getting more concise
"We do it on purpose," freshman Rep. Mike Mulvaney (R-S.C.), who ranked lowest with a 7.9 grade level, tells CNN. "People have been teaching this for decades. If you want someone to understand your message, you speak clearly and concisely." Ernest Hemingway wrote simple sentences, but that doesn't mean he was less mentally acute than William Faulkner, who employed more complex language. "I don't think anyone equates the polysyllabic nature of your words [with] intellect," says Mulvaney, who graduated with honors from Georgetown University and earned a law degree at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
3. Congress isn't dumb. This study is.
Our lawmakers don't talk like 10th graders, says David Haglund at Slate. The Flesch-Kincaid test is "an enormously reductive little tool" that was meant to measure precision of language, not smarts. People misuse it to impugn politicians they dislike. In January, Republicans guffawed over reports that President Obama's State of the Union speech was assessed at an eighth grade level, a new low for modern presidents. Now liberal journalists are trumpeting the Sunlight Foundation's findings because it gives them license to call Congress' new Tea Party contingent "sophomoric." Enough is enough.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Is Israel annexing Gaza?
Today's Big Question Israeli army prepares a major ground offensive and is said to have plans to 'fully occupy the territory'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Twitter: Breaking the Bird – a 'riveting' documentary
The Week Recommends BBC2's 'fascinating' film charts the social media platform's fall from grace
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
Detentions and hostile treatment: is it safe to visit the US?
The Explainer Spate of interrogations and deportations at US border sparking decline in overseas visitors
By The Week UK Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published