Obama's crackdown on oil speculators: 'More politics than substance'?
The White House says greedy traders are pushing up oil prices. But others see the president engaging in little more than an election-year gimmick

President Obama is calling on Congress to crack down on illegal speculation in the oil market, saying it's responsible for high prices at the pump. Plenty of traders legally buy and sell oil futures — which essentially allow them to purchase oil contracts at a set price at a later date — but the president wants to put an end to investors illegally trading such futures solely to manipulate, and profit from, the oil market. "We can't afford a situation where some speculators can reap millions while millions of American families get the short end of the stick," Obama said. Among other things, his $52 million proposal would bolster supervision of oil markets, and hand down tougher penalties for market manipulation. However, Republicans were quick to dismiss the proposal as political posturing. Is Obama's demand merely an election ploy?
Oil speculators aren't responsible for high gas prices: "Announcing a high-profile crackdown on oil market manipulators might play well with voters and motorists," but it has little do with gas prices, says John W. Schoen at MSNBC. Longterm trends in oil prices are determined by supply and demand — end of story. Obama's plan is "more politics than substance."
"Obama's oil market plan more politics than substance"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But it's an effective campaign tactic: This is a smart move by Obama, says Ed Rogers at The Washington Post. It shows voters "that he is doing something rather than nothing on oil prices." Because while admitting that gas prices are out of his control might have the benefit of truth, it makes him seem "plodding" and "flat-footed," and forces him to talk "down to people." This way, he shows "action and therefore, some concern, and he instantly produced good headlines."
"Obama's speculation crackdown is smart"
No it's not. It makes Obama look like a joker: This is not a serious energy proposal, says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. It seems Obama is "determined to roll out one gimmick after another." Like his other ridiculous gambits, this one "is presented with great sanctimony and many partisan accusations. But it's deeply cynical and unrelated to the real challenges we face." Voters might start seeing Obama as an "unserious" candidate. And that "should alarm Democrats."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Kill the Boer: Elon Musk and the anti-apartheid song
Under the radar Billionaire reignites controversy by linking South African 'struggle song' to 'white genocide'
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Critics’ choice: Restaurants worthy of their buzz
feature A fun bistro, a reservation worth the wait, and a modern twist on Mexican dishes
By The Week US Published
-
Film reviews: Snow White, Death of a Unicorn, and The Alto Knights
Feature A makeover for Disney’s first animated feature, greedy humans earn nature’s wrath, and a feud between crime bosses rattles the mob
By The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published