The payroll tax cut deal: 3 reasons the GOP caved
Congress finally agreed on a temporary extension of the tax holiday, just days before it was set to expire

Bowing to intense pressure, House Republicans on Thursday agreed to extend the payroll-tax cut for two months. The Senate promptly signed off on the deal, ending a bitter stalemate that had threatened to hike the amount withheld from the paychecks of 160 million workers starting Jan. 1 (someone with a $50,000 annual income, for instance, would have had an extra $1,000 docked from his salary over the course of 2012). Congress can now resume work on extending the break past the two-month grace period. House Speaker John Boehner and his caucus had been insisting on a full-year cut, saying the "uncertainty" of a short-term extension would hurt businesses. So why did Republicans cave? Here, three theories:
1. They realized the public was mad... at them
Vulnerable House Republicans, worried about next year's reelection battle, were the ones who begged "the Republican leadership to relent," says Greg Sargent at The Washington Post. Their constituents were angry that the stalemate was threatening to take a chunk out of their paychecks — $40 a week for the average taxpayer. That's pretty solid confirmation that "the public is concluding that Republicans are the ones to blame for allowing the tax hike (to) creep ever closer to reality."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. Obama forced GOP leaders to capitulate
Boehner said digging in against the temporary extension "may not have been the smartest thing in the world." That's an understatement, says Allahpundit at Hot Air. House Republicans spoonfed President Obama the opportunity to hold "a presser to demand action with middle-class taxpayers lovingly arrayed behind him," and those Republicans "caved" just a few hours later. "Now it looks like even more of a capitulation than it is. Merry Christmas from the GOP, champ." Oh, well. At least now "our dumb national nightmare is over."
3. Boehner managed to win a (minor) concession
This isn't the "best-possible version" of the bill hoped for, says Daniel Foster at National Review. Such a version would have fast-tracked a decision on the Keystone XL oil pipeline, included modest entitlement reform, and paid for it all without punishing new taxes. But in exchange for their cooperation, House Republicans did win "a 'technical correction' designed to 'minimize difficulties businesses might experience implementing the short-term, two-month tax cut extension.'" If this fix "really does make life easier for payroll processors, that's good!"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?
Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans
-
The history of animal metaphors in propaganda
The Explainer Rats, snakes and cockroaches among the imagery used to dehumanise political enemies and minority groups
-
How do new stadiums affect football clubs?
In the Spotlight Everton's decision to move its men's team out of Goodison Park could be a catalyst for vital change, but there are cautionary tales too
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy