Hold the line on insider trading
More importantly, insider trading gives those in the know incentives to hide information from corporate boards, and from the public, to maximize their own trading profits, said Larry Harris at the Los Angeles Times.
Larry Harris
Los Angeles Times
Don’t let anyone tell you we can do without insider trading laws, said Larry Harris. Hedge fund tycoon Raj Rajaratnam’s record prison sentence last week for profiting on illegal trading tips has given some people a renewed chance to argue that acting on inside information isn’t all that bad. It “makes prices more informative” of a stock’s true value, they like to say. The free market should run freely. And after all, “how do you draw the line between smart research and illegal information?” They even argue that insider trading wouldn’t “hurt shareholders in the long run” if it were considered a kind of employment benefit for executives that allowed corporations to pay them less.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Fortunately, all of these arguments are readily rebutted. There is no doubt that “most people believe that insider trading is simply unfair.” But more importantly, insider trading gives those in the know incentives to hide information from corporate boards, and from the public, to maximize their own trading profits. The financial crisis uncovered devastating problems with financial disclosure and corporate governance. “Eliminating insider trading rules would only make them worse.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Do smartphone bans in schools work?
The Explainer Trials in UK, New Zealand, France and the US found prohibition may be only part of the solution
-
Doom: The Dark Ages – an 'exhilarating' prequel
The Week Recommends Legendary shooter adds new combat options from timed parries to melee attacks and a 'particularly satisfying' shield charge
-
7 US cities to explore on a microtrip
The Week Recommends Not enough vacation days? No problem.
-
Issue of the week: Do high-speed traders rig the market?
feature Wall Street is abuzz over high-frequency trading.
-
Issue of the week: How Yellen spooked the markets
feature At her first press conference, the new Federal Reserve chair made the mistake of indicating when the Fed would raise interest rates.
-
Stop calling women ‘bossy’
feature Let’s ban “She’s bossy.” Instead, let’s try, “She has executive leadership skills.”
-
Issue of the week: GM’s recall disaster
feature Mary Barra is facing “her first big test” since she took over as GM’s new CEO in January: a recall of more than 1.6 million vehicles.
-
Issue of the week: Who gets Fannie’s and Freddie’s profits?
feature Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s shareholders want their money back.
-
Issue of the week: Comcast buying Time Warner Cable
feature Has Comcast won the cable wars?
-
Issue of the week: AOL’s million-dollar babies
feature AOL’s “gaffe-prone” CEO, Tim Armstrong, “got in some hot water” last week.
-
Issue of the week: Why Google unloaded Motorola
feature Three years after shelling out $12.5 billion for Motorola, Google announced its sale to Lenovo Group for $2.9 billion.