Bloomberg reported this week that News Corp.'s board had discussed whether to replace the company's scandal-plagued leader, Rupert Murdoch, with COO Chase Carey. So far, News Corp. is insisting that Murdoch, who denied responsibility for the News of the World phone-hacking mess in testimony to British Parliament on Tuesday, is staying put. No matter what happens, Murdoch will largely remain in control, because he owns 40 percent of the company's voting stock. But would it be better for the company and its shareholders if he stepped aside as the media empire's figurehead?
Yes. Murdoch's resignation is the only way to restore accountability: "Clearly, the company needs to clean house," says Eleanor Bloxham at Fortune. That means updating the board of directors, because it failed to "look into serious allegations" it knew about for years. But it also means Murdoch should give up either his CEO spot or his position as chairman of the board. That's not just a way to soothe shareholders — it's just good corporate governance to make sure the company isn't a one-man show.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Gabbard fires intelligence chiefs after Venezuela reportspeed read Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has fired the top two officials leading the National Intelligence Council
-
Critics' choice: Reimagined Mexican-American fareFeature A shape-shifting dining experience, an evolving 50-year-old restaurant, and Jalisco-style recipes
-
Here We Are: Stephen Sondheim's 'utterly absorbing' final musicalThe Week Recommends The musical theatre legend's last work is 'witty, wry and suddenly wise'
