Is the Michele Bachmann migraine story sexist?
The Daily Caller sparks an outcry with a report on the presidential candidate's supposed 'debilitating' headache problem

With her meteoric rise in the GOP presidential polls, the spotlight continues to shine on all facets of Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn). On Tuesday, a story at The Daily Caller harshly illuminates the presidential hopeful's supposed migraine problem. "The Minnesota Republican frequently suffers from stress-induced medical episodes that she has characterized as severe headaches," writes Jonathan Strong. "To staff, Bachmann has implausibly blamed the headaches on uncomfortable high-heel shoes, but those who have worked closely with her cite stress, a busy schedule, and anything going badly for Bachmann as causes." The article quotes both anonymous and named former staffers, and notes that the congresswoman takes a "significant amount of medication" to manage her "debilitating headache episodes." Is this a sexist smear?
No. Migraines could affect her ability to govern: "If Bachmann really does have debilitating migraines that put her out of commission for days at a time, that's relevant, gender-neutral information," says Jessica Grose at Slate. While I can understand why some commentators might think this is biased, it really isn't. Let's remember the uproar over John McCain's health in 2008. "It's possible that the Caller article was just a bunch of disaffected former Bachmann cronies dissing their former boss," but it's also possible that this is information that voters need to know.
"Reporting on Michele Bachmann's migraines isn't sexist"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But there's a sexist implication here: There might be some sexism here if you read between the lines, says Noreen Malone at New York. "Migraines happen to be overwhelmingly a woman's problem, and (though Bachmann's are supposedly stress-triggered), they are often linked to both menstruation and menopause — unavoidable biological side effects of being a woman." While the story might have been the same for one of the male candidates, given the nature of migraines, it's hard not to see this "as a reminder of the cave-man argument from way back against women holding office — that they might be undone by their hormones in moments of great stress."
"Is the Daily Caller's Michele Bachmann migraine story sexist?"
Besides, you can have migraines and be president: I'm anything but a Bachmann fan, but this migraine story "is deeply ignorant and unfair," says Dana Goldstein, a contributor to The Nation and The Daily Beast, at her site. Migraines are often discussed in a sexist manner, "with the implication being that women who suffer from migraines can't handle normal levels of stress." Of course, a number of factors can trigger migraines, and many sufferers are able to manage the condition and lead productive lives. Thomas Jefferson and Ulysses Grant both had migraines, while Kennedy and FDR had chronic medical problems and "popped pills." There are plenty of reasons Bachmann shouldn't be president. Let's talk about them, not her migraines.
"I thought hell would freeze over before I defended Michele Bachmann"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published