Can S&P scare Congress into shrinking the deficit?
The ratings agency slashes America's credit outlook, warning of major financial risks if politicians fail to reach a deal on reducing our long-term deficits

Standard & Poor's, one of the country's most influential credit-rating agencies, "fired a warning shot on Monday" about the growing U.S. debt load. S&P downgraded its credit outlook for the U.S. from "stable" to "negative," meaning it believes there is a one-in-three chance it will lower the government's sterling "AAA" rating within two years. The agency pointed to the political gridlock in Washington, and questioned whether President Obama and Republicans would agree on a plan to lower the deficit and reduce the national debt before the 2012 elections. Will S&P's downgrade get Obama and the Republicans on the same page?
This should spur Washington to act: Hopefully, this warning will act "as a catalyst" for politicians to agree on a "credible" package of reforms, says Mohammed El-Erian, CEO of bond giant PIMCO, in the Financial Times. Failure to do so would weaken the dollar and could drive up borrowing costs, "thereby undermining investment, employment and growth." The "time has come" for the U.S. "to take better control of its fiscal destiny — for the sake of American society and for the well being of the global economy."
"El-Erian: A warning for the US, and for the global economy"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
If only our political system wasn't broken: S&P basically said that it has no confidence in our political leaders "because they're pretty much all spineless cowards," says Hamilton Nolan at Gawker. And the Treasury's response — that S&P "underestimates the ability of America's leaders to come together" — is really "laughable" considering the partisan bickering that has gripped Washington for years. But, hey, "at least the problem is contained in a single sector: the economy."
"The American economy is collapsing some more today"
Who cares what S&P says? The agency "has a horrible track record for judging credit worthiness," says Dean Baker at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. It gave companies like Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, and Enron "top ratings" until they collapsed — and also gave good ratings to mortgage-backed securities that turned out to be junk. "Investors are aware that S&P's judgement does not mean very much."
"If a negative S&P outlook for the U.S. explains a drop in stock prices..."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Aston Martin Vantage Roadster: 'a rare treat indeed'
The Week Recommends The Roadster version of Aston Martin's new Vantage coupé makes even 'the most mundane journey feel special'
-
Bad Friend: Tiffany Watt Smith explores why women abandon friendships
The Week Recommends A 'deeply researched' account of female friendship through history
-
Brazil's reborn dolls craze
Under The Radar The 'hyper-realistic' babies soaring in popularity in South American nation have spawned controversy
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy