Social Security: Is the ‘lockbox’ empty?
Here is a fundamental truth: the government has borrowed $2.6 trillion from Social Security, which it can't pay back unless it borrows more money to do so.
“Leave Social Security alone.” That, says Peter Suderman in Reason.com, is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s official position on Social Security, which he insisted last week is solvent for the next two decades, and will thus be shielded from budget cutting or entitlement reform. Apparently, he and his fellow Democrats don’t care that the system last year paid out $61 billion more than it received in payroll taxes, or that it faces “$15 trillion in long-term unfunded liabilities.” Democrats are still yapping about the fictional “lockbox,” said Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post. The term, you’ll remember, comes from Al Gore’s 2000 campaign pledge to protect the Social Security Trust Fund, which since 1983 has built up $2.6 trillion to fund the baby boom retirement wave that is now upon us. Those funds have been “borrowed” and spent by the rapacious federal government, replaced in the lockbox by IOUs—meaningless pieces of paper. In reality, “there is nothing in the lockbox,” and Social Security is already running in the red.
This is a Republican scare tactic, whose ultimate goal is to privatize Social Security, said Paul Krugman in NYTimes.com. In reality, Social Security is not in any danger. Only if Congress votes “not to honor” the IOUs in the trust fund will the system be in trouble, and “that’s not going to happen.” The real issue is not Social Security per se, said Stephen Herrington in HuffingtonPost.com. It’s the amount of money the government raises through taxes. Since 1980, tax cuts instituted by Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush have cost the Treasury $8.25 trillion—“nearly all” the debt we’ve accumulated over that time. In effect, the GOP borrowed and spent the American people’s Social Security taxes so it could cut income taxes on the rich. Raise taxes on the rich, so the government can pay back its debts, and the Social Security “problem” goes away.
Forget the partisan bickering for a moment, said Tom Curry in MSNBC.com. It’s a simple, inarguable fact that the government has borrowed $2.6 trillion from Social Security that it won’t be able to pay back unless it borrows more money, at interest, from other lenders. That debt can be reduced if Congress cuts benefits and raises Social Security taxes. So do the math. Sooner or later, “the math is pointing to higher taxes and a reduction in future benefits.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Brazil has a scorpion problem
Under The Radar Venomous arachnids are infesting country's fast-growing cities
-
Why Rikers Island will no longer be under New York City's control
The Explainer A 'remediation manager' has been appointed to run the infamous jail
-
California may pull health care from eligible undocumented migrants
IN THE SPOTLIGHT After pushing for universal health care for all Californians regardless of immigration status, Gov. Gavin Newsom's latest budget proposal backs away from a key campaign promise
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy