A citizen's guide to a 'government shutdown'
A budget showdown could grind the federal government to a halt next week. How exactly would that play out?
President Obama and Congressional Republicans are playing a high-stakes "game of chicken," but if the parties can't agree on a new federal spending plan by March 4, the government may very well shut down for the first time in 15 years. What exactly does that mean? Here, a brief guide:
What constitutes a "government shut-down"?
Without money to pay for them, federal services both large and small would be affected. Some veterans might not get benefit checks, people would not be able to apply for Social Security, and the State Department might not issue new passports, says Ed O'Keefe in The Washington Post. Government-run museums and national parks would also probably close.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Would anything stay open?
Yes. "Essential" services, like those tied to national security, would continue. And the president has "wide discretion" to determine which agencies should stay open. The U.S. Mint would still pump out currency, and the post office would still deliver mail.
Could "non-essential" federal employees work anyway?
In a word, no. There won't be money to pay them. And even if they wanted to work without pay, they could be subject to fines of up to $5,000 (or two years in prison) for violating a federal law that forbids volunteer labor, says O'Keefe in The Washington Post. Last time, some of the "frustrated feds" who weren't allowed to work "sought temporary jobs as bike messengers and waitresses in order to pay holiday bills."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
What caused the last shutdown?
A similar budget battle. President Bill Clinton and the Congress led by Newt Gingrich clashed repeatedly over the spending plan, spurring two shutdowns. The first, in November, 1995, lasted five days and resulted in the furlough of 800,000 federal employees, according to a Congressional Research Service report. Then, after a temporary budget agreement expired the following month, the government shut down again from Dec. 16, 1995, to Jan. 6, 1996 — the longest closure in U.S. history.
How bad was it?
Payments to more than 400,000 veterans were delayed, as was the processing of Medicare and Social Security checks, though they were eventually sent out. The CDC "stopped their disease surveillance programs," new patients were not accepted into health research studies, and clean-up work at 609 toxic waste sites stopped, says David Corn at Politics Daily. Oh, and elephant manure piled up in a National Zoo parking lot because government workers couldn't ship it away for composting.
Will history repeat itself?
It's certainly possible, and federal agencies have reportedly told senior officials to get ready for a shutdown. There's still time to reach a compromise, but there remains a big gap between the budget demands of Republicans and Democrats. And if they can't agree, says Frank James at NPR, a shutdown means "a lot of economic pain at a time when a lot of people are already hurting."
Sources: Congressional Research Service, New York Daily News, Politics Daily, The Washington Post, NPR
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The Nutcracker: English National Ballet's reboot restores 'festive sparkle'
The Week Recommends Long-overdue revamp of Tchaikovsky's ballet is 'fun, cohesive and astoundingly pretty'
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published