Can Obama force China to improve its human-rights record?
Obama urged Chinese leader Hu Jintao to make progress on human rights — but should the president be throwing his weight around to effect real change?
President Obama on Wednesday pressed Chinese President Hu Jintao to improve his country's record on human rights, saying that China should live up to values enshrined in the Chinese Constitution. Hu emerged from the meeting declaring that his country has made progress, while admitting that "a lot still needs to be done" — a rare concession. Could Obama do more to get China's communist regime to respect basic, universal freedoms? (Watch Obama's mixed welcome)
Obama should be more forceful: President Obama has bent over backwards to avoid offending Chinese leaders, says Ellen Bork in The Weekly Standard, most shamefully by failing to meet with dissidents when he visited China last year. His "determination to avoid using the weight and prestige of his office to support democratic opponents of authoritarian regimes in China, Iran, Belarus, and elsewhere" is "dispiriting." It tells tyrants they can abuse their citizens with impunity, and sets back the cause of democracy all over the world.
"Why Liu matters, and Hu doesn't"
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Pushing too hard could backfire: Obama had to bring up human rights, says Leslie H. Gelb in Newsweek, to "to show that his administration, contrary to some doubters, actually cares about these issues." But Obama didn't take a riskier hard-line approach "because, in the end, Beijing would have mostly ignored the threats and the American side knew this well." Restoring "America's credibility for being tough and serious" gives us greater leverage, but pressing harder would only cause a rift with China, and that won't do anyone any good.
China will change on its own timetable: "Ultimately, no one will tame China," says Marco Vincenzino in The Hill. "It must tame itself." But that doesn't mean the U.S. and other countries should "stand by idly." President Obama must walk a fine line: He should avoid animosity and confrontation but "firmly stand his ground when engaging China." Anything less will "only embolden the Chinese to defy and strong-arm others," making "the Asia-Pacific region, and wider world, a less safe place."
"It's time to stand up to China"
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Greenland, Colombia, Cuba: where is Donald Trump eyeing up next?Today's Big Question Ousting Venezuela’s leader could embolden the US administration to exert its dominance elsewhere
-
Wilde Cambridge: home-away-from-home in a prime city spotThe Week Recommends This laid-back aparthotel is the perfect base for a weekend of exploring
-
The best alcohol-free alternatives for Dry JanuaryThe Week Recommends Whether emerging from a boozy Christmas, or seeking a change in 2026, here are some of the best non-alcoholic beers, wines and spirits to enjoy
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook