Is it 'sacrilegious' for Congress to work at Christmas?
Two Republicans say Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is offending Christians by cramming major legislation into Christmas week. Who's playing politics here?

On Capitol Hill, even Christmas can get politicized. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid put his colleagues on notice this week that he plans to bring up the START nuclear treaty with Russia and a massive $1.1 trillion omnibus bill that includes $8 billion of earmarks, even if it means working right up to Christmas. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), who has vowed to delay debate to let the next, more heavily Republican Congress decide on the issues, said it's "sacrilegious" to let politics encroach on Christmas, and his fellow conservative, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) said Reid was "disrespecting" Christians. Is their criticism fair — or absurd?
There is nothing sacrilegious about doing your job: "Americans nationwide are working this week and next," says Steve Benen in Washington Monthly. The Senate can, too. If Jim DeMint "doesn't care about monitoring Russia's long-range nuclear arsenal," he's free to vote against the New START Treaty. "But playing the Christmas Card is more than a little pathetic" — there is nothing sacrilegious about asking senators to do the work "we pay them to do."
"What Jim DeMint considers 'sacrilegious'"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Democrats are the ones shamelessly playing politics: Republicans have reason to be annoyed, says Jennifer Rubin in The Washington Post. "There is a method to this mad rush" — Harry Reid is dumping a "mammoth spending bill" and the START Treaty in his colleagues' laps in the hope of jamming things through without "adequate consideration." If these matters are so pressing, Democrats shouldn't have wasted so much of the lame duck Congress on things the public didn't want, such as "cap-and-trade and Obamacare."
"Harry Reid has a time management problem"
Reid is in the wrong, but not because of Christmas: There are lots of "good reasons" why Republicans "should slow things down in the lame duck," says Allahpundit in Hot Air, but the notion that it's "sacrilegious" to make senators work on Christmas "is not one of them." The real reason is that "momentous decisions on foreign policy and government funding should be made by the new Congress" to reflect midterm voters' wishes. "No need to drag Santa into it."
"Reid to DeMint and Kyl: Stop whining about having to work over the holidays"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The Christian thing to do is pass the treaty: If anything is "a misuse of the Christian holiday," says the Rev. Dr. Michael Kinnamon, general secretary, National Council of Churches, as quoted in the Hartford Courant, it's using Christmas as an excuse to "delay action on a treaty aimed at reducing the threat of nuclear war." Christmas is a time when our leaders should "work harder for peace on earth" — not postpone it.
"Ratify New START, say religious leaders. Celebrate Christmas with peace"
-
What is the Federal Reserve and what does it do?
The explainer The decisions made by the United States' central banking system have very real economic effects
-
'Natural disasters don't happen only in the movies'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump vs. the arts: Fresh strikes against PBS and the NEA
Feature Trump wants to cut funding for public broadcasting and the arts, which would save a little but cost a lot for red states
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy