Campaign financing: A flood of hidden cash
A flood of cash is being poured into this fall's congressional elections, much of it from new special-interest groups that don't have to disclose their donors.
For all the talk about angry Tea Partiers and economic ennui, the 2010 congressional elections could turn on “cold, anonymous cash,” said Michael Waldman in U.S. News & World Report. A flood of $80 million from shadowy new groups with names like Americans for Job Security is pouring into partisan TV ads and other campaign activities—about 85 percent of it to benefit Republican candidates. This massive and “alarmingly sneaky” outpouring of cash comes to us thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in its Citizens United decision this year broke with “nearly a century of settled law to hold that corporate campaign spending limits violate the First Amendment.” Since that landmark 5-to-4 decision, a host of new special-interest groups have come into being, organizing themselves as nonprofits, which don’t have to disclose their donors. “It’s bad enough that public offices can be bought,” said Eugene Robinson in The Washington Post. “It’s unconscionable we can’t even know who the buyers are.”
Oh, stop whining, said Jacob Sullum in the New York Post. Democrats are facing “an election fiasco of historic proportions,” so they’re already seizing on “a pre-emptive excuse: It’s all because of Citizens United.” That’s nonsense, since as polls show, voters turned against them months ago, because President Obama and the Democrats have used their power to indulge in an orgy of big-government spending. “Advocacy has no impact unless it persuades people.” As for why these groups don’t disclose their donors, former Republican Chairman Ed Gillespie recently pointed out that there’s a legitimate “fear of retribution.” After the California referendum that made gay marriage in that state illegal, for example, gay activists harassed conservative donors and organizers at their homes and jobs.
So “if you disclose political activity, people might … respond!” said Jonathan Chait in The New Republic. “Heaven forbid!” Boycotting corporations or sending unfriendly e-mails to political opponents is all part of democracy. Funny, not long ago conservatives argued that political contributions were a form of free speech and should be unlimited, as long as they were “transparent.” But last month, when Democrats tried to pass a law requiring disclosure of the contributions to these new, secretive groups, Republicans voted unanimously to block it. Now that the Supreme Court’s conservative bloc has approved both unlimited corporate spending and secrecy, Republican support for transparency will “fall down the memory hole.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'New arrivals are more than paying for themselves'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
6 stylish homes in Portland, Oregon
Feature Featuring a wall of windows in Collins View and a historic ballroom in Portland Heights
By The Week US Published
-
What's next for US interest rates?
The Explainer Stubborn inflation forestalls anticipated rate cuts
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published