Steele: One gaffe too many?
At a recent fundraiser, the chairman of the Republican National Committee called the war in Afghanistan “a war of Obama’s choosing” and implied that the U.S. is doomed to lose.
This time, Michael Steele really has gone too far, said William Kristol in The Weekly Standard. In Steele’s short tenure as chairman of the Republican National Committee, rarely has a week passed without his saying or doing something that embarrasses the party. But his latest gaffe is of a different order of magnitude. Footage surfaced last week of Steele telling an RNC fundraiser that the war in Afghanistan is “a war of Obama’s choosing” that the American public doesn’t want. Worse, Steele implied that the U.S. is doomed to lose it—saying that any “student of history” could tell you that “the one thing you don’t do is engage in a land war in Afghanistan.” Steele, of course, is factually incorrect—it was President Bush who declared war on Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks. More importantly, Steele’s anti-war sentiments put him “at odds with about 100 percent of the Republican Party,” which has called for extending the war beyond Obama’s one-year time line. It’s time for Steele to resign.
Republicans are in a bind, said Earl Hutchinson in HuffingtonPost.com. The GOP knows the gaffe-prone Steele is “not fit to head the RNC,” but it can’t get rid of him “for the very reason he was plucked for the lead role in the first place.” As a rare black Republican, Steele was chosen to disguise the fact that the GOP has become an insular party of white, extremely conservative, blue-collar voters from the South. But keeping him carries its own risks, said Rick Klein in ABCnews.com. With the November elections looming, party officials have already “given up trying to coordinate election planning or policy proposals through Steele’s RNC.” Even if he shuts his mouth for the next five months, Steele has already fragmented and weakened the GOP just as it prepares for battle.
Actually, said Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com, Steele’s gaffe may end up damaging Democrats more than Republicans. As soon as his Afghanistan comment came to light, the Democrats rushed out a statement condemning Steele for “betting against our troops and rooting for failure in Afghanistan.” If this attack on Steele’s patriotism sounds familiar, it is because it’s an obvious echo of the Right’s attacks during the Bush years on anyone who questioned the war strategy in Iraq or Afghanistan. With prospects in Afghanistan looking glum indeed, Democrats may well regret insisting that those who want to bring our troops home are spineless traitors.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published