Obama's BP press conference: Did he convince anyone?
The president took questions from the press yesterday to reassert his commitment to cleaning up the Gulf oil spill. Was it enough to silence his critics?

The president took questions from the media yesterday on the catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. During the 63-minute session, Obama reinforced that the government was ultimately responsible for cleaning up the mess. "My job is to get this fixed," he said. "I take responsibility." But Obama denied his administration had been "sitting on the sidelines," saying that the federal government had been handling the recovery "from the moment this disaster began." Was his press conference enough to persuade his critics he is doing enough? (Watch Obama take responsibility for the oil response)
Flowery language won't save Obama this time: This PR push is too little, too late, says Peggy Noonan in the Wall Street Journal. No amount of "heightened language" can repair the damage to Obama's political philosophy. The idea that the federal government should occupy a "more burly, significant and powerful place" in America has been entirely undone by the White House's "dodging and dithering" reaction to this spill.
"He was supposed to be competent"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The president gave a strong, convincing performance: By using the type of language "normally reserved for the burden of sending troops to war", says Ben Feller in Business Week, Obama "unequivocally" took charge of this situation. He reasserted his leadership credentials "plainly" and "prominently." In terms of maintaining his government's credibility, he stepped up to the plate.
"Analysis: Why Obama says oil mess is his to fix"
It was long on words, short on actual substance: This Q&A may have been a "powerful rhetorical rejoinder" to the administration's critics, says Dan Froomkin at the Huffington Post, but Obama didn't say anything of substance to convince doubters enough is being done. Even his claims of a "hands-on" approach were undermined by his embarrassing admission he didn't know MMS chief Elizabeth Birnbaum had lost her job. Short on facts, this exercise in "presidential optics" was not enough.
"Obama's oil spill press conference may have changed perceptions - but the reality remains the same"
He needs to leave the lectern and go to the Gulf: Obama should know that "in a crisis, Americans want to be stirred into action," says David Paul Kuhn at Real Clear Politics. This president has always been good with words. It's deeds that we are less convinced about. Instead of yet another "bullhorn speech," Obama must "get in the mud. Be off schedule, unscripted. Spend time with victims. Show you get it."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Natural disasters don't happen only in the movies'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump vs. the arts: Fresh strikes against PBS and the NEA
Feature Trump wants to cut funding for public broadcasting and the arts, which would save a little but cost a lot for red states
-
MLB lifts ban on Pete Rose, other dead players
speed read 16 deceased players banned for gambling and other scandals can now be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy