Should Obama take over the BP oil spill?

As the White House takes the heat for the Gulf disaster, it's facing growing pressure to push BP aside — but could that only worsen the situation?

Obama speaks to the press about the BP oil spill.
(Image credit: Getty)

As up to 95,000 barrels a day of BP oil gush unchecked into the Gulf, the chorus of "who's in charge?" is growing louder, putting the Obama administration on the defensive. Federal officials acknowledge that they have the authority to push BP out of the way and take charge of the unprecedented effort to cap the mile-deep oil well and clean up the unknown quantities of sweet crude polluting the Gulf. But is that a good idea? (Watch Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen stand behind BP)

By law, Obama has to take charge: The White House would love this to be BP's problem, says Andrew Revkin in The New York Times, but under the post–Exxon Valdez Oil Pollution Act, "Obama not only has the authority, but the obligation — however politically risky that might be — to take ownership" of the disaster. If BP's "Top kill" strategy fails this week, he needs to deploy an all-star "oil-well SWAT team," stat.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Sign up
Latest Videos FromThe Week

Explore your latest briefing

Explore your latest briefing