Oklahoma City: Flashback to 1995
On the 15th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing, former President Bill Clinton says the extreme rhetoric coming from the Right today reminds him of the political climate at the time of the tragedy in April 1995.
The Oklahoma City bombing was 15 years ago, said Carl Hulse in The New York Times, but to former President Bill Clinton, those awful memories are suddenly tinged with a new foreboding. Clinton spoke out last week on the anniversary of that deadly spasm of American terrorism, in which Timothy McVeigh detonated a massive truck bomb at a federal building, killing 168 innocent people, including 19 children. The extreme rhetoric coming today from the Right, Clinton said, reminds him of the climate in April 1995, with “profoundly alienated, disconnected people” insisting that “the greatest threat to American freedom is our government.” Such demonizing rhetoric, he warned, has “the potential for stirring a violent response.” As the prosecutor who helped convict McVeigh, I share that fear, said former federal prosecutor Aitan Goelman in Politico.com. When mainstream Republicans speak of “secession” and “revolution,” impressionable nuts like McVeigh can conclude that violent resistance is both moral and necessary.
Where was Clinton during the last Bush administration? said W. James Antle in The American Spectator. Why didn’t he spend those eight years admonishing mainstream liberals who warned that Bush and Cheney were dragging us toward a fascist, “imperial presidency”? Clearly, Clinton has no problem with extreme rhetoric per se, only with those “uncouth enough to criticize the government from the Right.” Once again, Clinton is milking 168 deaths for “political gain,” said Byron York in Examiner.com. Back in 1995, then–President Clinton—“in deep political trouble”—exploited the tragedy to tar all Republicans with the “extremist” brush. By suggesting, in effect, that “today’s Tea Partiers are tomorrow’s right-wing bombers,” Clinton once again hopes to suppress dissent by marginalizing it.
Try reading my mail, said Kathleen Parker in The Washington Post. I receive a steady stream of alarming communications from readers who are convinced that only armed resistance can prevent the coming of tyranny. These kind of people used to express their rage in letters written in crayon; in the Internet age, “the least sane among us” can share their views with the world. The number of hate and vigilante groups has swelled 54 percent over four years, and now totals 1,000. Given this climate, when mainstream politicians speak of putting opponents “in the cross hairs,” they are “complicit in whatever transpires.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Trump's actions cut a wide swath across Hawaii's economy
In Depth The state's tourism and farming sectors are two of the largest hit industries
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
5 immersive books to read this April for a brief escape
The Week Recommends A dystopian tale takes us to the library, a journalist's ode to her refugee parents and more
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
'The winners and losers of AI may not be where we expect'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published