Jobs: Time for another stimulus?
President Obama unveiled plans to stimulate the economy and jump-start hiring.
With the sagging economy eroding President Obama’s approval ratings, the administration is finally focusing on jobs, said Barbara Kiviat in Time.com. But “let’s not get our hopes up.” A new report last week showed the national unemployment rate still hovering at around 10 percent, although the number of jobs lost in November—11,000—was far lower than expected, and substantially less than the 100,000-plus lost jobs in preceding months. Hoping to jump-start hiring, President Obama this week unveiled a plan that would give small businesses a tax deduction for hiring new employees. He also proposed eliminating small firms’ capital gains tax for one year, pouring more federal money into highway and bridge reconstruction, and a “cash for caulkers” program that would give rebates to homeowners who hire people to make their homes energy efficient. And where will all this money come from? Obama wants to tap the roughly $200 billion left over from last year’s TARP bailouts.
That figures, said National Review in an editorial. By throwing another $200 billion down the rathole of January’s $787 billion “stimulus” bill, Obama is once again trying to spend his way out of the recession. The economy may be starting to revive all by itself, and Obama’s hiring “incentive” may simply encourage businesses to fire employees and hire new ones to claim their tax credit. Try as they might, said William McGurn in The Wall Street Journal, Obama and his team of Ivy-educated liberal smarty-pants can’t—and shouldn’t try to—decide what “kind of jobs the economy ought to create.” To create jobs, the federal government should cut taxes, stop meddling with private businesses, and have some faith “in the collective wisdom of the marketplace.”
If the country had relied on that wisdom, said Robert Creamer in HuffingtonPost.com, we’d now be mired in a deep depression, instead of recovering from a mere recession. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that if it weren’t for last year’s stimulus package, another 1.6 million of our fellow citizens would be out of work right now. “So if the first stimulus worked to create or save jobs, why not do it again?” Actually, it may no longer be necessary, said Daniel Gross in Slate.com. The surprising November jobs report shows that the worst is over, and that the end of the great recession of 2008–09 is truly upon us. With or without another stimulus, “we’ll be seeing jobs growth sooner rather than later.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The genetic secrets of South Korea's female free-divers
Under The Radar Unique physiology of 'real-life mermaid' haenyeo women could help treat chronic diseases
-
Democrats: How to rebuild a damaged brand
Feature Trump's approval rating is sinking, but so is the Democratic brand
-
Unraveling autism
Feature RFK Jr. has vowed to find the root cause of the 'autism epidemic' in months. Scientists have doubts.
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy