TSA's 'spectacular' snafu
The government mistakenly released top-secret screening tactics. Should Americans be worried?
In what is being called an "appalling and astounding breach of security," the Transportation and Security Administration inadvertently posted a 93-page screening procedure manual on the Internet. Secrets exposed include the percent of bags actually checked by security (20%), the countries meriting extra scrutiny (there are 12 of them), and rules for government officials (many are exempt from special screening). TSA officials insist the foul-up won't compromise national security, but many experts are questioning that. Does the blunder make fliers less safe?
This is a national disaster: This screw-up could easily qualify as "inadvertent treason," says Rick Moran at the American Thinker. The release of this "blueprint" guide to our security puts American lives in grave jeopardy —in fact, "it has the potential to absolutely destroy domestic air travel." After this, will anyone feel comfortable enough to fly the friendly skies?
"TSA leaves online love note for al Qaeda"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
These "secrets" don't seem terribly surprising: Why would anyone be "amazed" to hear that the TSA only checks 20% of bags? Frankly, "I'm sort of surprised it's that many," says Helen Anders in the Austin Statesman. "If the TSA had to hand-inspect every bag, we'd all have to show up at the airport 5 hours before our flights." Chances are the biggest consequence of this gaffe will be tighter security—just in time for the holiday travel crush.
"Uh-oh: TSA puts its security manual online"
The TSA has punked us: Average Americans are expected to jump through countless hoops in the name of "national security," writes Jo-Ann Armao in The Washington Post's PostPartisan blog. Now those same officials have done something that "renders all those steps meaningless." Will we ever trust the TSA the same way again? "Not likely."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Doom: The Dark Ages – an 'exhilarating' prequel
The Week Recommends Legendary shooter adds new combat options from timed parries to melee attacks and a 'particularly satisfying' shield charge
-
7 US cities to explore on a microtrip
The Week Recommends Not enough vacation days? No problem.
-
Sudoku medium: May 14, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy