Missile defense: Why did Obama kill Bush’s plan?
President Obama announced last week that he was abandoning the Bush administration’s plans for a missile-defense umbrella in Eastern Europe.
“If diplomatic pusillanimity was the aim,” said Rich Lowry in National Review Online, then President Obama has pulled off “a masterstroke.” Obama announced last week that he was abandoning the Bush administration’s plans for a missile-defense umbrella in Eastern Europe, designed to prevent an Iranian nuclear attack on the U.S. and Europe. Instead, Obama said, the U.S. will build a sea- and land-based system aimed at protecting Europe from Iran’s short- and medium-range missiles. Obama is selling his switch as a realistic adjustment to Iran’s actual missile capabilities, insisting that Iran won’t have intercontinental ballistic missiles until 2020. But the truth is that our gutless president has caved to “Russian bullying,” without getting anything tangible in return. The Russians loathed the idea of a U.S. missile-defense system based so close to its borders, in the former Warsaw Pact nations of Poland and the Czech Republic, and told Obama the plan stood in the way of improved relations. So what did Obama do? said Jamie M. Fly in The Weekly Standard. His best Neville Chamberlain impression. Perhaps he thinks that if we appease Vladimir Putin’s thugs, Russia might support the West’s efforts to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “More likely, Iran, Russia, and a watching world will see this for what it is: a colossal sign of U.S. weakness.”
Actually, it’s a sign that the U.S. now has a president who is in touch with “reality,” said Fareed Zakaria in Newsweek. Bush’s grand missile-defense plan was a pure “fantasy,” and even his administration admitted it wouldn’t work until 2018 at the earliest. Ever since President Ronald Reagan first proposed the fantastical “Star Wars” missile-defense system in the 1980s, the U.S. has blown more than $150 billion to develop a workable system to shoot down enemy missiles—more than we spent on the Apollo mission to the moon. “Yet in 25 years the program has not produced a workable weapons system—something unprecedented even in the annals of the Pentagon’s bloated budgets.” Since Tehran has no ICBMs anyway, said Peter Scoblic in The New Republic Online, “it makes more sense to focus on the threat from short- and medium-range missiles that Iran has had more success in developing.” From both a defense and a diplomatic perspective, it’s “absolutely the right move.”
Tell that to the Czechs and the Poles, said The Washington Post in an editorial. Officials in the two nations had defied both Russia and opposition at home to host the missile-defense system, and are now complaining publicly that Obama treated them as afterthoughts, calling them just hours before he made the public announcement. So now these nations are wondering: Can they count on the U.S. to have their back if Russia continues to intimidate and threaten neighboring nations? It’s a valid question, making it even more important that Obama “reap a diplomatic reward” for taking this “diplomatic risk,” said the Chicago Tribune. On Oct. 1, Iran will meet with the U.S. and other world powers, and the topic of Tehran’s pursuit of a nuclear bomb will surely arise. If Russia—which is Iran’s biggest trading partner and ally—backs the West’s insistence that it call off bomb development, Iran might have little choice but to give in. In that scenario, Obama will look smart for acceding to Russia on the missile shield. But if Russia lets Iran continue its defiance, Obama will look like a sucker.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Today's political cartoons - May 5, 2024
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - annoying noises, gag orders, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 highly educational cartoons about student protests
Cartoons Artists take on apolitical camping, the National Guard, and more
By The Week US Published
-
French schools and the scourge of teenage violence
Talking Point Gabriel Attal announces 'bold' intervention to tackle rise in violent incidents
By The Week UK Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published